Now showing items 21-22 of 22

    • Solar Energy, Warm And Fuzzy, Or Bad Investment?

      Current, Robert W. (The University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ), 2011)
      When considering solar energy, it’s helpful to understand two common uses of solar, generation of electrical power, and use for heating water. Generation of power is commonly done by use of Photovoltaic (PV) panels, which generates direct current (DC), which is then often converted to alternating current (AC) which is more commonly used for power distribution in the modern world. Solar water heating is done by a number of means that collect heat, and transfer the heat directly to water held in a holding tank, sometimes a separate container, and sometimes directly into a more conventional system similar to or the same as a hot water heater tank. Use of solar energy in both of these ways reduces the need to use power generated from natural gas, coal, oil, hydroelectric, or nuclear power sources. However, both methods of capturing power to be used in a commercial or residential setting are limited by the availability of sunlight. Therefore, use of solar power has limitations of both geographical and temporal restrictions. Areas with more sunlight can make better use of solar energy, and solar energy can only be captured during daylight hours. While this limitation seems significant, consider that use of power is also cyclic. Peak power use is often midday, when there is also peak ability to generate solar power. Since there is a match in this way, solar energy is in a position to help offset this peak usage situation. We can break down into general scales of the applications of solar power generation: the residential (homes and apartments) generation of solar power, the commercial (small and large businesses) generation of solar power, and the industrial (power plant scale) generation of solar power. Each of these areas currently has significantly different issues, creating opportunity and limitations that distinguish the effectiveness of implementing solar solutions.
    • Farmers' Rights and Open Source Licensing

      Beck, Ryann (The University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ), 2011)
      The TRIPS treaty requires that WTO members offer patent or sui generis protections for plant life. Yet, many developing countries oppose intellectual property for plant life because, for those nations, plant IP has proven to be financially, environmentally, and socially detrimental. The farmers’ rights movement has grown out of such opposition and is an effort on the part of interest groups and developing countries to afford subsistence farmers control over farming methods and compensation for their contribution to the world‘s biodiversity. Developing nations and farmers’ rights groups have spearheaded multiple treaties aiming to curtail plant monopoly rights; however, the treaties have been ineffective and the growing strength of plant monopolies in developed countries is unlikely to wane. Meanwhile, farmers need a solution that allows them to maintain control over their farming practices, preserve traditional cross-breeding methods, and receive compensation for their contribution to the state of the art of crop varieties. Open source provides such a solution. An open-source regime protecting farmer-developed plant varieties would utilize intellectual property and copyleft-inspired seed wrap licenses to generate a pool of plant species that farmers could freely grow, improve, and market. Open source programs would further farmers’ rights by protecting farmer-developed resources from predatory monopolization and by providing an entity through which farmers can share information and have a voice in agriculture-related policy-making. Additionally, open source pools would act to conserve biodiversity and promote environmentally-friendly farming by encouraging farmers to cultivate plant varieties adapted to local climates and disease instead of using mass-produced seed and treating heavily with pesticides.