AuthorYanez, Luisa Fernanda
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
AbstractWhen looking at landmark Supreme Court cases, it becomes clear that there are two main styles of advocacy – one shotters and repeat players. These styles are defined by the tactics that they utilize when arguing in front of the Justices. Although it is not clear if one style is more successful than another, it is interesting to see how they compare to each other and what facts of the case they choose to emphasize. Each was formed in response in response to the court’s reduction of oral argument time and their increased aggression during their argument.