Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHudgens, S.
dc.contributor.authorNewton, L.
dc.contributor.authorEremenco, S.
dc.contributor.authorCrescioni, M.
dc.contributor.authorSymonds, T.
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, P.C.G.
dc.contributor.authorReasner, D.S.
dc.contributor.authorByrom, B.
dc.contributor.authorO’Donohoe, P.
dc.contributor.authorVallow, S.
dc.contributor.authorPatient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium
dc.contributor.authorElectronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) Consortium
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T18:46:09Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T18:46:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-26
dc.identifier.citationHudgens, S., Newton, L., Eremenco, S. et al. Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: quantitative study findings. J Patient Rep Outcomes 6, 119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00521-3
dc.identifier.issn2509-8020
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s41687-022-00521-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/670432
dc.description.abstractObjective: To quantitatively compare equivalence and compliance of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collected via provisioned device (PD) versus bring your own device (BYOD). Methods: Participants with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) completed the EXAcerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT®) daily and COPD Assessment Test™ (CAT) and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) of COPD weekly on either PD or BYOD for 15 days, then switched device types for 15 days. EXACT was scored using the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS®: COPD) algorithm and equivalence assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) adjusting for cross-over sequence, period, and time. Two one-sided tests (TOSTs) used ICC adjusted means with 10%, 20%, and 40% of total score tested as equivalence margins. Compliance and comfort with technology were assessed. Equivalence across 3 device screen sizes was assessed following the second completion period. Results: Participants (N = 64) reported high comfort with technology, with 79.7% reporting being “quite a bit” or “very” comfortable. Weekly compliance was high (BYOD = 89.7–100%; PD = 76.9–100%). CAT and E-RS: COPD scores correlated well with PGIS (r > 0.50) and demonstrated equivalence between PD and BYOD completion (ICC = 0.863–0.908). TOST equivalence was achieved within 10% of the total score (p > 0.05). PRO measure scores were equivalent across 3 different screen sizes (ICC = 0.972–0.989). Conclusions: Measure completion was high and scores equivalent between PD and BYOD, supporting use of BYOD in addition to PD for collecting PRO data in COPD studies and in demographically diverse patient populations. © 2022, The Author(s).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBring your own device
dc.subjectBYOD
dc.subjectCOPD
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome
dc.subjectPRO
dc.titleComparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: quantitative study findings
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Public Health, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
refterms.dateFOA2023-12-21T18:46:09Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s41687-022-00521-3.pdf
Size:
1.187Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).