Community Workflows to Advance Reproducibility in Hydrologic Modeling: Separating Model-Agnostic and Model-Specific Configuration Steps in Applications of Large-Domain Hydrologic Models
Name:
Community_Workflows_to_Advance ...
Size:
7.821Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Knoben, W.J.M.Clark, M.P.
Bales, J.
Bennett, A.
Gharari, S.
Marsh, C.B.
Nijssen, B.
Pietroniro, A.
Spiteri, R.J.
Tang, G.
Tarboton, D.G.
Wood, A.W.
Affiliation
Hydrology & Atmospheric Sciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022-10-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
John Wiley and Sons IncCitation
Knoben, W. J. M., Clark, M. P., Bales, J., Bennett, A., Gharari, S., Marsh, C. B., ... & Wood, A. W. (2022). Community workflows to advance reproducibility in hydrologic modeling: Separating model‐agnostic and model‐specific configuration steps in applications of large‐domain hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 58(11), e2021WR031753.Journal
Water Resources ResearchRights
© 2022. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Despite the proliferation of computer-based research on hydrology and water resources, such research is typically poorly reproducible. Published studies have low reproducibility due to incomplete availability of data and computer code, and a lack of documentation of workflow processes. This leads to a lack of transparency and efficiency because existing code can neither be quality controlled nor reused. Given the commonalities between existing process-based hydrologic models in terms of their required input data and preprocessing steps, open sharing of code can lead to large efficiency gains for the modeling community. Here, we present a model configuration workflow that provides full reproducibility of the resulting model instantiations in a way that separates the model-agnostic preprocessing of specific data sets from the model-specific requirements that models impose on their input files. We use this workflow to create large-domain (global and continental) and local configurations of the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives (SUMMA) hydrologic model connected to the mizuRoute routing model. These examples show how a relatively complex model setup over a large domain can be organized in a reproducible and structured way that has the potential to accelerate advances in hydrologic modeling for the community as a whole. We provide a tentative blueprint of how community modeling initiatives can be built on top of workflows such as this. We term our workflow the “Community Workflows to Advance Reproducibility in Hydrologic Modeling” (CWARHM; pronounced “swarm”). © 2022. The Authors.Note
Open access articleISSN
0043-1397Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2021WR031753
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.