Analyzing the Difference in the Length of Stay (LOS) in Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Patients Receiving Hydroxychloroquine or Favipiravir
Name:
pharmaceuticals-15-01456.pdf
Size:
1.396Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Alosaimi, B.Alshanbari, H.M.
Alturaiqy, M.
AlRawi, H.Z.
Alamri, S.
Albujaidy, A.
Bin Sabaan, A.
Alrashed, A.A.
Alamer, A.
Alghofaili, F.
Al-Duraymih, K.
Alshalani, A.J.
Alturaiki, W.
Affiliation
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022-11-24Keywords
COVID-19effectiveness
favipiravir
hydroxychloroquine
length of stay
SARS-CoV-2
statistical analysis
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Alosaimi, B., Alshanbari, H. M., Alturaiqy, M., AlRawi, H. Z., Alamri, S., Albujaidy, A., Bin Sabaan, A., Alrashed, A. A., Alamer, A., Alghofaili, F., Al-Duraymih, K., Alshalani, A. J., & Alturaiki, W. (2022). Analyzing the Difference in the Length of Stay (LOS) in Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Patients Receiving Hydroxychloroquine or Favipiravir. Pharmaceuticals, 15(12).Journal
PharmaceuticalsRights
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus led to a global pandemic. HCQ and FPV were used early in the pandemic as a treatment modality for COVID-19. Various studies evaluated the HCQ and FPV effectiveness, based on the mortality endpoint and showed conflicting results. We hypothesize that analyzing the difference in the LOS as a significant endpoint would be of a major interest, especially for healthcare providers, to prevent a lengthy hospitalization and disease progression. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study, conducted via a medical chart review of COVD-19 patients who were admitted between April 2020 and March 2021 with a moderate to severe illness. The LOS endpoint was tested using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank (WSR) model. Prior to using the WSR model, the balance between the HCQ and FPV groups, the propensity score matching, the LOS distribution, and the normality assumptions were tested. Two sensitivity statistical analyses were conducted to confirm the results (stratified log-rank test and U Welch test after transforming the LOS by the squared root values). Results: A total of 200 patients were included for the analysis: 83 patients in the HCQ group and 117 patients in the FPV group. Thirty-seven patients were matched in each group. The LOS data was positively skewed and violated the normality (Shapiro–Wilk p < 0.001) and had an unequal variance (Levene’s test, p = 0.019). The WSR test showed no statistical significance in the LOS endpoint, with a median of −0.75 days (95% confidence interval: −4.0 to 2.5, p = 0.629), in favor of the HCQ group (four days), in comparison to seven days of the FPV group. The WSR findings were further confirmed with the stratified log rank test (p = 740) and the U Welch test (p = 391). Conclusions: The study concluded that the HCQ and FPV treatments have a comparable effectiveness in terms of the LOS in the moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. This study highlights the importance of analyzing the LOS as a relevant endpoint, in order to prevent the costs of a lengthy hospitalization and disease progression. The current study also emphasizes the importance of applying the appropriate statistical testing when dealing with two-sample paired data and analyzing non-parametric data such as the LOS. © 2022 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
1424-8247Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/ph15121456
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).