Lower myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy
Name:
Lower Myocardial Infarction and ...
Size:
267.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Sarver Heart Center, College of Medicine, University of ArizonaCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix
Issue Date
2023-12-19Keywords
cardiac complicationlaparoscopic intervention
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
open cholecystectomy
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Future Medicine LtdCitation
Keele, T., Hashemzadeh, M., & Movahed, M. R. (2023). Lower myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy. Future Cardiology, (0).Journal
Future cardiologyRights
© 2024 Future Science Group.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Aim: We compared inpatient outcome data of open (OC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Patients & methods: We used the National Inpatient Samples database from 2010-2014. Results: LC was done in 340,999 and OC in 68,529 OC patients. In 2010, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prevalence was 0.2 versus 0% (OR: 3.1, CI: 1.7-5.5; p < 0.001), non-STEMI 1 versus 0.4% (OR: 2.5 CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0001), mortality 3.4 versus 0.4% (OR: 9.2, CI: 7.9-10.6; p < 0001). After multivariate adjustment, OC remained independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality (mortality multivariate OR: 6.4, CI: 5.5-7.4; p < 0001, STEMI OR: 2.2. CI: 1.2-3.9; p = 0.007, non-STEMI OR: 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.9; p < 0001). Conclusion: OC is independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality compared with LC.Note
12 month embargo; first published 19 December 2023EISSN
1744-8298PubMed ID
38112267Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2217/fca-2023-0102
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.
- Authors: Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA
- Issue date: 2013 Dec 12
- Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.
- Authors: Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA
- Issue date: 2013 Sep 3
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred approach in cirrhosis: a nationwide, population-based study.
- Authors: Chmielecki DK, Hagopian EJ, Kuo YH, Kuo YL, Davis JM
- Issue date: 2012 Dec
- Port site metastases a year after initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Should the use of retrieval bags during laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the new gold standard?
- Authors: Petryshyn N, Dražić T, Hogendorf P, Strzelczyk J, Strzałka A, Szwedziak K, Durczyński A
- Issue date: 2021 May 31
- Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.
- Authors: Bravo CA, Hirji SA, Bhatt DL, Kataria R, Faxon DP, Ohman EM, Anderson KL, Sidi AI, Sketch MH Jr, Zarich SW, Osho AA, Gluud C, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Høfsten DE, Brennan JM
- Issue date: 2017 May 3