Is Cl isotope fractionation in the seawater-evaporite system dependent on seawater chemistry?
Name:
Eastoe and Meng final.pdf
Embargo:
2025-11-19
Size:
1.087Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Department of Geosciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-11-19Keywords
Geochemistry and PetrologyGeology
Fractionation factors
Halite
Marine evaporites
Secular change
Stable Cl isotopes
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier BVCitation
Eastoe, C. J., & Meng, F. (2024). Is Cl isotope fractionation in the seawater-evaporite system dependent on seawater chemistry?. Chemical Geology, 644, 121832.Journal
Chemical GeologyRights
© 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Published values, near 1.0003, of the fractionation factor for stable Cl isotopes between halite and brine (αhal-br) fail to account for several sets of δ37Cl data for marine evaporitic halite. Clustered negative values of δ37Cl data, including some that appear to correspond to basal halite, would require measurable secular change in δ37Cl of marine chloride during the Phanerozoic if αhal-br is invariant. Such change is inconsistent with understanding of the geochemical cycle of Cl. Alternatively, marine δ37Cl has remained constant, but αhal-br has undergone secular change between values of about 1.0003 and 0.9996 in Phanerozoic marine evaporite settings. Such an interpretation is favored by the occurrence of clustered negative δ37Cl values at times when potash-facies evaporite contained sylvite rather than MgSO4 minerals, reflecting long-term secular change in seawater chemistry. Values of αhal-br may therefore depend on brine composition.Note
24 month embargo; first published 19 November 2023ISSN
0009-2541Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121832