Orienteering the landscape of urban water sustainability indicators
Affiliation
School of Government & Public Policy, University of ArizonaSchool of Landscape Architecture & Planning, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-02
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Citation
Berger, L., Henry, A. D., & Pivo, G. (2023). Orienteering the landscape of urban water sustainability indicators. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 17, 100207.Rights
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Indicator frameworks for urban water sustainability are very diverse, with tools designed for different practical use cases and employing different assessment approaches. This creates a complex landscape that scholars and practitioners must successfully “orienteer” so that they may effectively apply the literature to develop theory and/or manage practical problems of sustainability. Based on a systematic analysis of indicator frameworks for urban water sustainability, this paper presents an overview of framework designs and current design trends. Five key framework design decisions and respective options are outlined, and the patterns in and implications of their use are discussed. While the decisions were identified based on material for assessing urban water sustainability, the categories of decisions and options are relevant to environmental sustainability more broadly. The paper is aimed at framework users looking for an overview of different framework designs and their benefits and drawbacks and framework designers interested in common options, current trends, and difficulties. © 2022 The AuthorsNote
Open access journalISSN
2665-9727Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.indic.2022.100207
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.