Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreaves, S.W.
dc.contributor.authorAlter, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, R.A.
dc.contributor.authorHughes, K.E.
dc.contributor.authorDoos, D.
dc.contributor.authorClayton, L.M.
dc.contributor.authorSolano, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorEcheverri, S.
dc.contributor.authorShih, R.D.
dc.contributor.authorHughes, P.G.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T05:45:23Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T05:45:23Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.identifier.citationGreaves, S. W., Alter, S. M., Ahmed, R. A., Hughes, K. E., Doos, D., Clayton, L. M., ... & Hughes, P. G. (2023). A Simulation-based PPE orientation training curriculum for novice physicians. Infection Prevention in Practice, 5(1), 100265.
dc.identifier.issn2590-0889
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100265
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/670720
dc.description.abstractBackground: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is effective in preventing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. Resident knowledge of proper use and effective training methods is unknown. We hypothesise that contamination decreases and knowledge increases after a formalised PPE educational session. Methods: Participants included first year interns during their residency orientation in June 2020. Before training, participants took a knowledge test, donned PPE, performed a simulated resuscitation, and doffed. A standardised simulation-based PPE training of the donning and doffing protocol was conducted, and the process repeated. Topical non-toxic highlighter tracing fluid was applied to manikins prior to each simulation. After doffing, areas of contamination, defined as discrete fluorescent areas on participants' body, was evaluated by ultraviolet light. Donning and doffing were video recorded and asynchronously rated by two emergency medicine (EM) physicians using a modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol. The primary outcome was PPE training effectiveness defined by contamination and adherence to CDC sequence. Results: Forty-eight residents participated: 24 internal medicine, 12 general surgery, 6 EM, 3 neurology, and 3 psychiatry. Before training, 81% of residents were contaminated after doffing; 17% were contaminated after training (P<0.001). The most common contamination area was the wrist (50% pre-training vs. 10% post-training, P<0.001). Donning sequence adherence improved (52% vs. 98%, P<0.001), as did doffing (46% vs. 85%, P<0.001). Participant knowledge improved (62%–87%, P <0.001). Participant confidence (P<0.001) and preparedness (P<0.001) regarding using PPE increased with training. Conclusion: A simulation-based training improved resident knowledge and performance using PPE. © 2022 The Authors
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectFluorescent tracer
dc.subjectPPE
dc.subjectQuality improvement
dc.subjectSimulation
dc.subjectTraining
dc.titleA Simulation-based PPE orientation training curriculum for novice physicians
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalInfection Prevention in Practice
dc.description.noteOpen access journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleInfection Prevention in Practice
refterms.dateFOA2024-01-24T05:45:23Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S259008892200066X-main.pdf
Size:
753.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.