Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuizzi, Victoria J.
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Alison H.
dc.contributor.authorBronstein, Judith L.
dc.contributor.authorArnold, A. Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T21:29:58Z
dc.date.available2024-01-29T21:29:58Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-17
dc.identifier.citationLuizzi, V. J., Harrington, A. H., Bronstein, J. L., & Arnold, A. E. (2024). Nectar robbers and simulated robbing differ in their effects on nectar microbial communities. Plant Species Biology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12446en_US
dc.identifier.issn0913-557X
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1442-1984.12446
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/670894
dc.description.abstractFloral nectar contains microbes that can influence nectar chemistry and pollinator visitation, and these microbial communities can be affected by pollinators in turn. Some flowers are also visited by nectar robbers, which feed on nectar through holes cut in floral tissue. If nectar robbers alter nectar microbial communities, they might have unexpected impacts on pollinator visitation. We investigated whether robbing could affect nectar microbial communities directly, by introducing microbes, or indirectly, by triggering a plant response to floral damage. We applied four treatments to flowers of Tecoma × “Orange Jubilee” (Bignoniaceae) in an arboretum setting: flowers were (1) covered to exclude all visitors; (2) available to both pollinators and nectar robbers and robbed naturally by carpenter bees; (3) available to pollinators only but cut at the base to simulate nectar robbing damage; or (4) available to pollinators only. We found that nectar in flowers accessible to any visitors was more likely to contain culturable microbes than flowers from which visitors were excluded. Microbial community composition and beta diversity were similar across treatments. Among flowers containing culturable microbes, flowers available to pollinators and nectar robbers had higher microbial abundance than flowers with simulated robbing, but there were no differences between flowers available to pollinators and robbers and unwounded flowers from which robbers were excluded. Overall, our results suggest that floral damage can affect some features of nectar microbial communities, but specific effects of nectar robbing are limited compared with the influence of visitation in general.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Food and Agricultureen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Society for the Study of Species Biology.en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subjectPlant Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.subjectEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematicsen_US
dc.subjectflowersen_US
dc.subjectnectar microbesen_US
dc.subjectnectar robbingen_US
dc.subjectplant–animal interactionen_US
dc.titleNectar robbers and simulated robbing differ in their effects on nectar microbial communitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1442-1984
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizonaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBio5 Institute, The University of Arizonaen_US
dc.identifier.journalPlant Species Biologyen_US
dc.description.note12 month embargo; first published 17 January 2024en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal accepted manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.pii10.1111/1442-1984.12446
dc.source.journaltitlePlant Species Biology


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
PSB-2023-0054.R2(0102F).pdf
Size:
966.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record