Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuiroga, R.E.
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, L.J.
dc.contributor.authorNamur, P.R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T00:26:23Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T00:26:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.citationQuiroga, R. E., Blanco, L. J., & Namur, P. R. (2018). Defoliation intensity and simulated grazing strategy effects on three C4 rangeland bunchgrasses. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 71(1), 58-66.
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2017.09.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/670996
dc.description.abstractDefoliation intensity and timing are two important factors determining plants response to grazing. These factors can be managed by adjusting stocking rate and applying a grazing strategy. In a 6-yr clipping experiment conducted in northwestern Argentina, we assessed the effect of different defoliation intensities (~ 30%, ~ 50%, and ~ 70% removal of the annually produced aboveground biomass) and simulated grazing strategies (continuous grazing, two-paddock rest-rotation, three-paddock rest-rotation, dormant season grazing) on plots of three C4 native bunchgrasses (Pappophorum vaginatum, Trichloris crinita, and Digitaria californica). Response variables were mean and trend of clipped-off biomass during the 6 yr of treatments, number of inflorescences, and aboveground biomass produced on the year following treatments end (to evaluate residual effect of treatments). Results were species dependent. Mean clipped-off biomass increased with defoliation intensity in T. crinita and D. californica. However, defoliation intensity negatively affected clipped-off biomass trend in T. crinita and the production of P. vaginatum and T. crinita during “residual effect” evaluation. The three species responded positively at least in one response variable to the amount of rest periods in the grazing strategy. Our results are not fully consistent with the concept that forage production is more influenced by defoliation intensity than by grazing strategy: In two of the three species, grazing strategy presented greater impact on response variables than defoliation intensity. When significant “defoliation intensity × grazing strategy” was detected, intensity tended to be more detrimental as grazing strategy allows fewer rest periods. We observed a residual effect of treatments in the three species (generally, negative effect of defoliation intensity and positive effect of grazing strategies with more rest periods). Our results show that dormant season utilization and rest periods are beneficial for maximizing mean clipped-off biomass and ensuring clipped-off biomass trend. High defoliation intensities can maximize short-term clipped-off biomass, but it may produce negative residual effects and trends.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rights© 2017 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectdefoliation
dc.subjectDigitaria californica
dc.subjectforage
dc.subjectgrazing
dc.subjectPappophorum vaginatum
dc.subjectTrichloris crinita
dc.titleDefoliation Intensity and Simulated Grazing Strategy Effects on Three C4 Rangeland Bunchgrasses
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.eissn1551-5028
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume71
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage58
dc.source.endpage66
refterms.dateFOA2024-02-22T00:26:23Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
S1550742417300957.pdf
Size:
724.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record