Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoreira-Arce, D.
dc.contributor.authorUgarte, C.S.
dc.contributor.authorZorondo-Rodríguez, F.
dc.contributor.authorSimonetti, J.A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T00:27:10Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T00:27:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.identifier.citationMoreira-Arce, D., Ugarte, C. S., Zorondo-Rodríguez, F., & Simonetti, J. A. (2018). Management tools to reduce carnivore-livestock conflicts: current gap and future challenges. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 71(3), 389-394.
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2018.02.005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/671046
dc.description.abstractPredation on domestic animals by carnivores is a persistent problem wherever carnivores and livestock co-occur. A wide range of management tools to reduce predation has been invoked. However, the evidence of their effectiveness is still limited for a broader range of species and conditions. Using a global analysis of domestic animal predation by native carnivores under a “before-after/control-impact” framework, we assessed the effectiveness of management techniques used to reduce domestic animal predation identifying knowledge gaps and research needs. We reviewed 291 predation cases in 149 studies published between 1990 and 2017 involving 47 carnivores. Lethal control is the most common method to reduce predation in comparison with nonlethal techniques. Yet the effectiveness of both approaches remains poorly evaluated (30.1% of study cases) and largely based on producers’ perceptions (70% of cases where effectiveness was evaluated). Lethal control and night confinement of domestic animals would have no effect on reducing predation, whereas the use of livestock-guarding dogs, fencing, or herdsmen may significantly reduce domestic animal losses. When the effectiveness of each technique to reduce predation was assessed by large and mesocarnivores, fencing significantly reduced predation of domestic animals by the former. Despite little scientifically published material, our findings indicate lethal control would have no effect in reducing animal predation by native carnivores when compared with nonlethal techniques. Our study also indicates the effectiveness may vary depending on the type of carnivore involved in the conflict with livestock activity. The use of an evidence-based framework to measure and assess the differential effectiveness of nonlethal techniques and the use of complementary tools at different spatial and temporal scales must be research priorities to prevent livestock predation while promoting the conservation of carnivores in production-oriented lands as encouraged by the Convention of Biological Diversity.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rights© 2018 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcarnivora
dc.subjectcarnivore management
dc.subjecthuman–wildlife conflicts
dc.subjectlivestock predation
dc.subjectproduction-oriented lands
dc.titleManagement Tools to Reduce Carnivore-Livestock Conflicts: Current Gap and Future Challenges
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.eissn1551-5028
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume71
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage389
dc.source.endpage394
refterms.dateFOA2024-02-22T00:27:10Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
S1550742418300290.pdf
Size:
311.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record