Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSharma, S.
dc.contributor.authorOchsner, T.E.
dc.contributor.authorTwidwell, D.
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, J.D.
dc.contributor.authorKrueger, E.S.
dc.contributor.authorEngle, D.M.
dc.contributor.authorFuhlendorf, S.D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T00:27:13Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T00:27:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.identifier.citationSharma, S., Ochsner, T. E., Twidwell, D., Carlson, J. D., Krueger, E. S., Engle, D. M., & Fuhlendorf, S. D. (2018). Nondestructive estimation of standing crop and fuel moisture content in tallgrass prairie. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 71(3), 356-362.
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2018.01.001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/671049
dc.description.abstractAccurate estimation of standing crop and herbaceous fuel moisture content (FMC) are important for grazing management and wildfire preparedness. Destructive sampling techniques have been used to accurately estimate standing crop and FMC, but those techniques are laborious and time consuming. Existing nondestructive methods for estimating standing crop in tallgrass prairie have limitations, and few studies have examined nondestructive estimation techniques for FMC in this environment. Therefore, our objective was to develop robust models for nondestructive estimation of standing crop and FMC in tallgrass prairie. We calibrated and validated stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for standing crop and FMC using data collected in tallgrass prairies near Stillwater, Oklahoma. Day of year (DOY), canopy height (CH), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and percent reflectance in five wavelength bands were candidate input variables for the models. The study spanned two growing seasons and nine patches located within three pastures under patch burn management, and the resulting data set with > 3 000 observations was split randomly with 85% for model calibration and 15% withheld for validation. Standing crop ranged from 0 to 852 g m− 2, and FMC ranged from 0% to 204%. With DOY, CH, and NDVI as predictors, the SMLR model for standing crop produced a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 119 g m− 2 on the validation data, while the RMSE of the corresponding ANN model was 116 g m− 2. With the same predictors, the SMLR model for FMC produced an RMSE of 26.7% compared with 23.8% for the corresponding ANN model. Thus, the ANN models provided better prediction accuracy but at the cost of added computational complexity. Given the large variability in the underlying datasets, the models developed here may prove useful for nondestructive estimation of standing crop and FMC in other similar grassland environments. © 2018 Society for Range Management
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rights© 2018 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.titleNondestructive Estimation of Standing Crop and Fuel Moisture Content in Tallgrass Prairie
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.eissn1551-5028
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume71
dc.source.issue3
dc.source.beginpage356
dc.source.endpage362
refterms.dateFOA2024-02-22T00:27:13Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
S1550742418300034.pdf
Size:
880.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record