Potential to improve winter grazing pastures: Sieben Land and Livestock study
Issue Date
2021-06Keywords
Economic sustainabilityIntermediate wheatgrass
Meadow bromegrass
Orchardgrass
Quality
Stockpiled forage
Tall fescue
Winter grazing
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hibbard, C., Hibbard, C., Larsen, R., Feuz, R., Rigby, C. W., Jensen, K. B., & Larsen, R. (2021). Potential to improve winter grazing pastures: Sieben Land and Livestock study. Rangelands, 43(3), 100-110.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
RangelandsAdditional Links
https://rangelands.orgAbstract
Maintaining economic sustainability requires reduced inputs such as mechanically harvested forage. It is estimated that grazing versus feeding cattle during the winter can save 42% to 70% of the yearly input costs in the western United States and Saskatchewan, Canada. Grass mixtures of intermediate wheatgrass and meadow bromegrass produced 2 and 3 times the stockpiled forage than orchardgrass and native range, respectively. Economic pay-back period on the initial pasture establishment costs were < 1 year for intermediate wheatgrass, meadow bromegrass/intermediate wheatgrass, and meadow bromegrass/tall fescue mixtures.Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
0190-0528ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rala.2020.12.007
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management.