Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance
Author
Anwar, F.Clark, M.
Lindsey, J.
Claus-Walker, R.
Mansoor, A.
Nguyen, E.
Billy, J.
Lainhart, W.
Shehab, K.
Viswanathan, V.K.
Vedantam, G.
Affiliation
School of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of ArizonaDepartment of Pathology, Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, Banner University Medical CenterUniversity of Arizona
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arizona
Bio5 Institute for Collaborative Research, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-10-18
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media SACitation
Anwar F, Clark M, Lindsey J, Claus-Walker R, Mansoor A, Nguyen E, Billy J, Lainhart W, Shehab K, Viswanathan VK and Vedantam G (2023) Prevalence of diagnostically-discrepant Clostridioides difficile clinical specimens: insights from longitudinal surveillance. Front. Med. 10:1238159. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1238159Journal
Frontiers in MedicineRights
© 2023 Anwar, Clark, Lindsey, Claus-Walker, Mansoor, Nguyen, Billy, Lainhart, Shehab, Viswanathan and Vedantam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated diarrheal disease prevalent worldwide. A common diagnostic algorithm relies on a two-step protocol that employs stool enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the pathogen, and its toxins, respectively. Active CDI is deemed less likely when the Toxin EIA result is negative, even if the pathogen-specific EIA is positive for C. difficile. We recently reported, however, that low-toxin-producing C. difficile strains recovered from Toxin-negative (‘discrepant’) clinical stool specimens can be fully pathogenic, and cause lethality in a rodent CDI model. To document frequency of discrepant CDI specimens, and evaluate C. difficile strain diversity, we performed longitudinal surveillance at a Southern Arizona tertiary-care hospital. Methods: Diarrheic stool specimens from patients with clinical suspicion of CDI were obtained over an eight-year period (2015–2022) from all inpatient and outpatient Units of a > 600-bed Medical Center in Southern Arizona. Clinical laboratory EIA testing identified C. difficile-containing specimens, and classified them as Toxin-positive or Toxin-negative. C. difficile isolates recovered from the stool specimens were DNA fingerprinted using an international phylogenetic lineage assignment system (“ribotyping”). For select isolates, toxin abundance in stationary phase supernatants of pure cultures was quantified via EIA. Results: Of 8,910 diarrheic specimens that underwent diagnostic testing, 1733 (19.4%) harbored C. difficile. Our major findings were that: (1) C. difficile prevalence and phylogenetic diversity was stable over the 8-year period; (2) toxigenic C. difficile was recovered from 69% of clinically Tox-neg (‘discrepant’) specimens; (3) the six most prevalent USA ribotypes were recovered in significant proportions (>60%) from Tox-neg specimens; and (4) toxin–producing C. difficile recovered from discrepant specimens produced less toxin than strains of the same ribotype isolated from non-discrepant specimens. Conclusion: Our study highlights the dominance of Toxin EIA-negative CDI specimens in a clinical setting and the high frequency of known virulent ribotypes in these specimens. Therefore, a careful reevaluation of the clinical relevance of diagnostically-discrepant specimens particularly in the context of missed CDI diagnoses and C. difficile persistence, is warranted. Copyright © 2023 Anwar, Clark, Lindsey, Claus-Walker, Mansoor, Nguyen, Billy, Lainhart, Shehab, Viswanathan and Vedantam.Note
Open access journalISSN
2296-858XPubMed ID
37928470Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fmed.2023.1238159
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 Anwar, Clark, Lindsey, Claus-Walker, Mansoor, Nguyen, Billy, Lainhart, Shehab, Viswanathan and Vedantam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Related articles
- Low-toxin Clostridioides difficile RT027 strains exhibit robust virulence.
- Authors: Anwar F, Roxas BAP, Shehab KW, Ampel NM, Viswanathan VK, Vedantam G
- Issue date: 2022 Dec
- Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.
- Authors: Senoh M, Kato H, Honda H, Fukuda T, Tagashira Y, Horiuchi H, Chiba H, Suzuki D, Hosokawa N, Kitazono H, Norisue Y, Kume H, Mori N, Morikawa H, Kashiwagura S, Higuchi A, Kato H, Nakamura M, Ishiguro S, Morita S, Ishikawa H, Watanabe T, Kojima K, Yokomaku I, Bando T, Toimoto K, Moriya K, Kasahara K, Kitada S, Ogawa J, Saito H, Tominaga H, Shimizu Y, Masumoto F, Tadera K, Yoshida J, Kikuchi T, Yoshikawa I, Watanabe T, Honda M, Yokote K, Toyokawa T, Miyazato H, Nakama M, Mahe C, Reske K, Olsen MA, Dubberke ER
- Issue date: 2019 Dec
- Changes in the Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method, Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype, and Clinical Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection: One Institution's Experience.
- Authors: Menon A, Perry DA, Motyka J, Weiner S, Standke A, Penkevich A, Keidan M, Young VB, Rao K
- Issue date: 2021 Nov 2
- Clostridium difficile colonization among patients with clinically significant diarrhea and no identifiable cause of diarrhea.
- Authors: Dubberke ER, Reske KA, Hink T, Kwon JH, Cass C, Bongu J, Burnham CD, Henderson JP
- Issue date: 2018 Nov
- Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile isolated from paediatric patients in Western Australia 2019-2020.
- Authors: Perumalsamy S, Lim SC, Riley TV
- Issue date: 2022 Jun

