A Comprehensive Optical Search for Pre-explosion Outbursts from the Quiescent Progenitor of SN 2023ixf
Name:
Dong_2023_ApJ_957_28.pdf
Size:
1.374Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Dong, Y.Sand, D.J.
Valenti, S.
Bostroem, K.A.
Andrews, J.E.
Hosseinzadeh, G.
Hoang, E.
Janzen, D.
Jencson, J.E.
Lundquist, M.
Meza, Retamal, N.E.
Pearson, J.
Shrestha, M.
Haislip, J.
Kouprianov, V.
Reichart, D.E.
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-10-20
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of PhysicsCitation
Yize Dong et al 2023 ApJ 957 28Journal
Astrophysical JournalRights
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We perform a comprehensive search for optical precursor emission at the position of SN 2023ixf using data from the DLT40, ZTF, and ATLAS surveys. By comparing the current data set with precursor outburst hydrodynamical model light curves, we find that the probability of a significant outburst within 5 yr of explosion is low, and the circumstellar material (CSM) ejected during any possible precursor outburst is likely smaller than ∼0.015M ⊙. By comparing to a set of toy models, we find that, if there was a precursor outburst, the duration must have been shorter than ∼100 days for a typical brightness of M r ≃ −9 mag or shorter than 200 days for M r ≃ −8 mag; brighter, longer outbursts would have been discovered. Precursor activity like that observed in the normal Type II SN 2020tlf (M r ≃ −11.5) can be excluded in SN 2023ixf. If the dense CSM inferred by early flash spectroscopy and other studies is related to one or more precursor outbursts, then our observations indicate that any such outburst would have to be faint and only last for days to months, or it occurred more than 5 yr prior to the explosion. Alternatively, any dense, confined CSM may not be due to eruptive mass loss from a single red supergiant progenitor. Taken together, the results of SN 2023ixf and SN 2020tlf indicate that there may be more than one physical mechanism behind the dense CSM inferred around some normal Type II supernovae. © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
0004-637XVersion
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-4357/acef18
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.

