Physicians’ Perspectives on HL7 Information Policy Sensitive Value Set: A Validation Study through Health Concept Categorization
Name:
healthcare-11-02845-v2.pdf
Size:
277.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Eluru, M.Mendoza, D.H.
Wong, A.
Jafari, M.
Todd, M.
Bayless, P.
Chern, D.
Eldredge, C.
Fonseca, R.
Franco-Fuquen, P.
Garcia-Robledo, J.E.
Gifford, B.G.
Hans, R.
Moreno-Cortes, E.F.
Perumbeti, A.
Vargas-Cely, F.S.
Zhao, L.
Grando, M.A.
Affiliation
College of Medicine, University of Arizona, PhoenixIssue Date
2023-10-28Keywords
data protection and privacygranular patient consent
HL7 terminology
information sensitive data sharing
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Eluru, M.; Mendoza, D.H.; Wong, A.; Jafari, M.; Todd, M.; Bayless, P.; Chern, D.; Eldredge, C.; Fonseca, R.; Franco-Fuquen, P.; et al. Physicians’ Perspectives on HL7 Information Policy Sensitive Value Set: A Validation Study through Health Concept Categorization. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11212845Journal
Healthcare (Switzerland)Rights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The Health Level 7 (HL7) organization introduced the Information Sensitivity Policy Value Set with 45 sensitive data categories to facilitate the implementation of granular electronic consent technology. The goal is to allow patients to have control over the sharing of their sensitive medical records. This study represents the first attempt to explore physicians’ viewpoints on these categories. Twelve physicians participated in a survey, leading to revisions in 21 HL7 categories. They later classified 600 clinical data items through a second survey using the updated categories. Participants’ perspectives were documented, and data analysis included descriptive measures and heat maps. In the first survey, six participants suggested adding 19 new categories (e.g., personality disorder), and modifying 25 category definitions. Two new categories and sixteen revised category definitions were incorporated to support more patient-friendly content and inclusive language. Fifteen new category recommendations were addressed through a revision of category definitions (e.g., personality disorder described as a behavioral health condition). In the second survey, data categorizations led to recommendations for more categories from ten participants. Future revisions of the HL7 categories should incorporate physicians’ viewpoints, validate the categories using patient data or/and include patients’ perspectives, and develop patient-centric category specifications. © 2023 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2227-9032Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/healthcare11212845
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.