Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Functional Interpolation for Solving the Matrix Differential Riccati Equation
Name:
mathematics-11-03635.pdf
Size:
968.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
System & Industrial Engineering, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-08-23Keywords
differential Lyapunov equationdifferential Riccati equation
functional interpolation
optimal control
physics-informed neural network
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Drozd, K.; Furfaro, R.; Schiassi, E.; D’Ambrosio, A. Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Functional Interpolation for Solving the Matrix Differential Riccati Equation. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11173635Journal
MathematicsRights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
In this manuscript, we explore how the solution of the matrix differential Riccati equation (MDRE) can be computed with the Extreme Theory of Functional Connections (X-TFC). X-TFC is a physics-informed neural network that uses functional interpolation to analytically satisfy linear constraints, such as the MDRE’s terminal constraint. We utilize two approaches for solving the MDRE with X-TFC: direct and indirect implementation. The first approach involves solving the MDRE directly with X-TFC, where the matrix equations are vectorized to form a system of first order differential equations and solved with iterative least squares. In the latter approach, the MDRE is first transformed into a matrix differential Lyapunov equation (MDLE) based on the anti-stabilizing solution of the algebraic Riccati equation. The MDLE is easier to solve with X-TFC because it is linear, while the MDRE is nonlinear. Furthermore, the MDLE solution can easily be transformed back into the MDRE solution. Both approaches are validated by solving a fluid catalytic reactor problem and comparing the results with several state-of-the-art methods. Our work demonstrates that the first approach should be performed if a highly accurate solution is desired, while the second approach should be used if a quicker computation time is needed. © 2023 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2227-7390Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/math11173635
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.