Legal Natural Language Processing from 2015-2022: A Comprehensive Systematic Mapping Study of Advances and Applications
Name:
Legal_Natural_Language.pdf
Size:
8.265Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-11-16Keywords
Deep learningDeep Learning
Information retrieval
Law
Legal-NLP
Natural language processing
Search problems
Surveys
Systematic-Mapping-Study
Systematics
Task analysis
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Quevedo, E., Cerny, T., Rodriguez, A., Rivas, P., Yero, J., Sooksatra, K., ... & Taibi, D. (2023). Legal Natural Language Processing from 2015-2022: A Comprehensive Systematic Mapping Study of Advances and Applications. IEEE Access.Journal
IEEE AccessRights
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The surge in legal text production has amplified the workload for legal professionals, making many tasks repetitive and time-consuming. Furthermore, the complexity and specialized language of legal documents pose challenges not just for those in the legal domain but also for the general public. This emphasizes the potential role and impact of Legal Natural Language Processing (Legal NLP). Although advancements have been made in this domain, particularly after 2015 with the advent of Deep Learning and Large Language Models (LLMs), a systematic exploration of this progress until 2022 is nonexistent. In this research, we perform a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) to bridge this gap.We aim to provide a descriptive statistical analysis of the Legal NLP research between 2015 and 2022. Categorize and sub-categorize primary publications based on their research problems. Identify limitations and areas of improvement in current research. Using a robust search methodology across four reputable indexers, we filtered 536 papers down to 75 pivotal articles. Our findings reveal the diverse methods employed for tasks such as Multiclass Classification, Summarization, and Question Answering in the Legal NLP field.We also highlight resources, challenges, and gaps in current methodologies and emphasize the need for curated datasets, ontologies, and a focus on inherent difficulties like data accessibility. As the legal sector gradually embraces Natural Language Processing (NLP), understanding the capabilities and limitations of Legal NLP becomes vital for ensuring efficient and ethical application. The research offers insights for both Legal NLP researchers and the broader legal community, advocating for continued advancements in automation while also addressing ethical concerns. AuthorsNote
Open access journalISSN
2169-3536Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3333946
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.