Remote sensing of evapotranspiration for irrigated crops at Yuma, Arizona, USA
Name:
1-s2.0-S037837742300447X.pdf
Size:
7.695Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
French, A.N.Sanchez, C.A.
Wirth, T.
Scott, A.
Shields, J.W.
Bautista, E.
Saber, M.N.
Wisniewski, E.
Gohardoust, M.R.
Affiliation
University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-11-16
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Citation
French, Andrew N., et al. "Remote sensing of evapotranspiration for irrigated crops at Yuma, Arizona, USA." Agricultural Water Management 290 (2023): 108582.Journal
Agricultural Water ManagementRights
Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
A satellite-based vegetation index model that tracks daily crop growth and evapotranspiration (ETc) is developed, tested, and validated over irrigated farms in Yuma irrigation districts of Arizona and California. Model inputs are remotely sensed normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) images, crop type maps, and local weather. The utility and novelty of the model is a more accurate assessment of ETc than currently provided by the US Bureau of Reclamation's evapotranspiration modeling system. The model analyzes NDVI time series data from the European Space Agency's Sentinel-2 satellites using the Google Earth Engine, constructs FAO-56 style crop growth stages from NDVI, and then estimates daily ETc using pre-defined crop coefficients (Kc) and grass reference evapotranspiration (ETos). Four crops were selected to test and evaluate model performance: short-season broccoli, mid-season cotton and wheat, and perennial alfalfa. Comparison of model results showed that Reclamation reports overestimate alfalfa and wheat ETc by 21–25%, cotton ETc by 6%, and underestimate broccoli ETc by 21%. Variability resolved by the model ranged 6–18% of median total ETc. Comparison of model results with those obtained from 13 eddy covariance sites showed validation discrepancies ranging 1–14%: average total actual ETc differences were 12, − 14, 78, and 87 mm/season, respectively, for alfalfa, broccoli, cotton, and wheat. The wide availability of Sentinel-2 data, collected every 5 days or less, and the rapid processing via Google Earth Engine make the vegetation index model implementation fast and practical. Its accuracy and ability to resolve ETc for every field would benefit the Reclamation water accounting system and provide valuable consumptive water use data for any Colorado River stakeholder. © 2023Note
Open access articleISSN
0378-3774Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108582
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).