Col-OSSOS: The Distribution of Surface Classes in Neptune's Resonances
Name:
Pike_2023_Planet._Sci._J._4_200.pdf
Size:
960.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Pike, R.E.Fraser, W.C.
Volk, K.
Kavelaars, J.J.
Marsset, M.
Peixinho, N.
Schwamb, M.E.
Bannister, M.T.
Peltier, L.
Buchanan, L.E.
Benecchi, S.
Tan, N.J.
Affiliation
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-10-31
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of PhysicsCitation
Rosemary E. Pike et al 2023 Planet. Sci. J. 4 200Journal
Planetary Science JournalRights
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The distribution of surface classes of resonant trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) provides constraints on the protoplanetesimal disk and giant planet migration. To better understand the surfaces of TNOs, the Colours of the Outer Solar System Origins Survey acquired multiband photometry of 102 TNOs and found that the surfaces of TNOs can be well described by two surface classifications: BrightIR and FaintIR. These classifications both include optically red members and are differentiated predominantly based on whether their near-infrared spectral slope is similar to their optical spectral slope. The vast majority of cold classical TNOs, with dynamically quiescent orbits, have the FaintIR surface classification, and we infer that TNOs in other dynamical classifications with FaintIR surfaces share a common origin with the cold classical TNOs. Comparison between the resonant populations and the possible parent populations of cold classical and dynamically excited TNOs reveal that the 3:2 has minimal contributions from the FaintIR class, which could be explained by the ν 8 secular resonance clearing the region near the 3:2 before any sweeping capture occurred. Conversely, the fraction of FaintIR objects in the 4:3 resonance, 2:1 resonance, and the resonances within the cold classical belt suggest that the FaintIR surface formed in the protoplanetary disk between ≳34.6 and ≲47 au, though the outer bound depends on the degree of resonance sweeping during migration. The presence and absence of the FaintIR surfaces in Neptune’s resonances provides critical constraints for the history of Neptune’s migration, the evolution of the ν 8, and the surface class distribution in the initial planetesimal disk. © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
2632-3338Version
Final published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/PSJ/ace2c2
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.

