Hubble Constant Measurement from Three Large-separation Quasars Strongly Lensed by Galaxy Clusters
Name:
Napier_2023_ApJ_959_134.pdf
Size:
619.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-12-14
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of PhysicsCitation
Kate Napier et al 2023 ApJ 959 134Journal
Astrophysical JournalRights
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Tension between cosmic microwave background-based and distance ladder-based determinations of the Hubble constant H 0 motivates the pursuit of independent methods that are not subject to the same systematic effects. A promising alternative, proposed by Refsdal in 1964, relies on the inverse scaling of H 0 with the delay between the arrival times of at least two images of a strongly lensed variable source such as a quasar. To date, Refsdal’s method has mostly been applied to quasars lensed by individual galaxies rather than by galaxy clusters. Using the three quasars strongly lensed by galaxy clusters (SDSS J1004+4112, SDSS J1029+2623, and SDSS J2222+2745) that have both multiband Hubble Space Telescope data and published time delay measurements, we derive H 0, accounting for the systematic and statistical sources of uncertainty. While a single time delay measurement does not yield a well-constrained H 0 value, analyzing the systems together tightens the constraint. Combining the six time delays measured in the three cluster-lensed quasars gives H 0 = 74.1 ± 8.0 km s−1 Mpc−1. To reach 1% uncertainty in H 0, we estimate that a sample size of order of 620 time delay measurements of similar quality as those from SDSS J1004+4112, SDSS J1029+2623, and SDSS J2222+2745 would be needed. Improving the lens modeling uncertainties by a factor of two and a half may reduce the needed sample size to 100 time delays, potentially reachable in the next decade. © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
0004-637XVersion
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-4357/ad045a
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.