More than 17,000 tree species are at risk from rapid global change
Name:
s41467-023-44321-9.pdf
Size:
9.504Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Boonman, C.C.F.Serra-Diaz, J.M.
Hoeks, S.
Guo, W.-Y.
Enquist, B.J.
Maitner, B.
Malhi, Y.

Merow, C.
Buitenwerf, R.
Svenning, J.-C.
Affiliation
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2024-01-02
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Nature ResearchCitation
Boonman, C.C.F., Serra-Diaz, J.M., Hoeks, S. et al. More than 17,000 tree species are at risk from rapid global change. Nat Commun 15, 166 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44321-9Journal
Nature CommunicationsRights
© The Author(s) 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Trees are pivotal to global biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people, yet accelerating global changes threaten global tree diversity, making accurate species extinction risk assessments necessary. To identify species that require expert-based re-evaluation, we assess exposure to change in six anthropogenic threats over the last two decades for 32,090 tree species. We estimated that over half (54.2%) of the assessed species have been exposed to increasing threats. Only 8.7% of these species are considered threatened by the IUCN Red List, whereas they include more than half of the Data Deficient species (57.8%). These findings suggest a substantial underestimation of threats and associated extinction risk for tree species in current assessments. We also map hotspots of tree species exposed to rapidly changing threats around the world. Our data-driven approach can strengthen the efforts going into expert-based IUCN Red List assessments by facilitating prioritization among species for re-evaluation, allowing for more efficient conservation efforts. © 2024, The Author(s).Note
Open access journalISSN
2041-1723Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41467-023-44321-9
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.