The amygdala is not necessary for the familiarity aspect of recognition memory
Name:
s41467-023-43906-8.pdf
Size:
1.327Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
School of Anthropology, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-12-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Nature ResearchCitation
Basile, B.M., Costa, V.D., Schafroth, J.L. et al. The amygdala is not necessary for the familiarity aspect of recognition memory. Nat Commun 14, 8109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43906-8Journal
Nature CommunicationsRights
This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Dual-process accounts of item recognition posit two memory processes: slow but detailed recollection, and quick but vague familiarity. It has been proposed, based on prior rodent work, that the amygdala is critical for the familiarity aspect of item recognition. Here, we evaluated this proposal in male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with selective bilateral excitotoxic amygdala damage. We used four established visual memory tests designed to assess different aspects of familiarity, all administered on touchscreen computers. Specifically, we assessed monkeys’ tendencies to make low-latency false alarms, to make false alarms to recently seen lures, to produce curvilinear ROC curves, and to discriminate stimuli based on repetition across days. Three of the four tests showed no familiarity impairment and the fourth was explained by a deficit in reward processing. Consistent with this, amygdala damage did produce an anticipated deficit in reward processing in a three-arm-bandit gambling task, verifying the effectiveness of the lesions. Together, these results contradict prior rodent work and suggest that the amygdala is not critical for the familiarity aspect of item recognition. © 2023, This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.Note
Open access journalISSN
2041-1723PubMed ID
38062014Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41467-023-43906-8
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Related articles
- Recognition errors suggest fast familiarity and slow recollection in rhesus monkeys.
- Authors: Basile BM, Hampton RR
- Issue date: 2013 Jul 17
- Double dissociation of selective recollection and familiarity impairments following two different surgical treatments for temporal-lobe epilepsy.
- Authors: Bowles B, Crupi C, Pigott S, Parrent A, Wiebe S, Janzen L, Köhler S
- Issue date: 2010 Jul
- Amygdala lesions selectively impair familiarity in recognition memory.
- Authors: Farovik A, Place RJ, Miller DR, Eichenbaum H
- Issue date: 2011 Sep 25
- An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory.
- Authors: Eichenbaum H, Fortin N, Sauvage M, Robitsek RJ, Farovik A
- Issue date: 2010 Jul
- Similar time course of fast familiarity and slow recollection processes for recognition memory in humans and macaques.
- Authors: Wu Z, Kavanova M, Hickman L, Lin F, Buckley MJ
- Issue date: 2020 Jul