Understanding the encoding of object locations in small-scale spaces during free exploration using eye tracking
Name:
Muller_et_al_manuscript_revisi ...
Size:
1.946Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Department of Psychology, University of ArizonaEvelyn McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona
Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-04-18
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier LtdCitation
Muller, A., Garren, J. D., Cao, K., Peterson, M. A., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2023). Understanding the encoding of object locations in small-scale spaces during free exploration using eye tracking. Neuropsychologia, 184, 108565.Journal
NeuropsychologiaRights
Published by Elsevier Ltd.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Navigation is instrumental to daily life and is often used to encode and locate objects, such as keys in one's house. Yet, little is known about how navigation works in more ecologically valid situations such as finding objects within a room. Specifically, it is not clear how vision vs. body movements contribute differentially to spatial memory in such small-scale spaces. In the current study, participants encoded object locations by viewing them while standing (stationary condition) or by additionally being guided by the experimenter while blindfolded (walking condition) after viewing the objects. They then retrieved the objects from the same or different viewpoint, creating a 2 × 2 within subject design. We simultaneously recorded participant eye movements throughout the experiment using mobile eye tracking. The results showed no statistically significant differences among our four conditions (stationary, same viewpoint as encoding; stationary, different viewpoint; walking, same viewpoint; walking, different viewpoint), suggesting that in a small real-world space, vision may be sufficient to remember object locations. Eye tracking analyses revealed that object locations were better remembered next to landmarks and that participants encoded items on one wall together, suggesting the use of local wall coordinates rather than global room coordinates. A multivariate regression analysis revealed that the only significant predictor of object placement accuracy was average looking time. These results suggest that vision may be sufficient for encoding object locations in a small-scale environment and that such memories may be formed largely locally rather than globally.Note
18 month embargo; first published 18 April 2023EISSN
1873-3514PubMed ID
37080425Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108565
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Of "what" and "where" in a natural search task: Active object handling supports object location memory beyond the object's identity.
- Authors: Draschkow D, Võ ML
- Issue date: 2016 Aug
- Control of memory retrieval alters memory-based eye movements.
- Authors: Kulkarni M, Nickel AE, Minor GN, Hannula DE
- Issue date: 2024 Aug
- Increased overt attention to objects in early deaf adults: An eye-tracking study of complex naturalistic scenes.
- Authors: Zeni S, Laudanna I, Baruffaldi F, Heimler B, Melcher D, Pavani F
- Issue date: 2020 Jan
- Not all those who wander are lost: Spatial exploration patterns and their relationship to gender and spatial memory.
- Authors: Gagnon KT, Thomas BJ, Munion A, Creem-Regehr SH, Cashdan EA, Stefanucci JK
- Issue date: 2018 Nov
- Developing global spatial memories by one-shot across-boundary navigation.
- Authors: Lei X, Mou W
- Issue date: 2022 Jun