Name:
Clawbacks (Babenko, Bennett, ...
Size:
884.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Eller College of Management, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-01-31
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)Citation
Ilona Babenko, Benjamin Bennett, John M Bizjak, Jeffrey L Coles, Jason J Sandvik, Clawback Provisions and Firm Risk, The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Volume 12, Issue 2, May 2023, Pages 191–239, https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfad003Rights
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Many of the events that trigger clawback provisions are associated with risky corporate policies and variable performance outcomes. We propose and test the hypothesis that clawback provisions motivate managers to reduce firm risk. Panel ordinary least squares, general method of moments with instrumental variables, and propensity square matching models all indicate that clawback provisions decrease the volatility of stock returns. The channels that connect clawback presence to firm risk include more conservative investment and financial policies. The clawback-induced reduction in risk-taking appears to benefit shareholders on average. The gains from reduced risk-taking are larger for firms with fewer growth options, lower R&D, and prior wrongdoing.Note
24 month embargo; first published 31 January 2023ISSN
2046-9128EISSN
2046-9136Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/rcfs/cfad003