The Potential for Common Core and Response to Intervention as Intersecting Initiatives: Supporting Readers Who Struggle with High-Level Standards
Name:
RtI16Dec22AuthorDetailsClean.pdf
Size:
401.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Jaeger, Elizabeth L.Affiliation
The University of Arizona Graduate College, The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-02-05
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.Citation
Jaeger, Elizabeth L. (2024). The potential for Common Core and Response to Intervention as intersecting initiatives: Supporting readers who struggle with high-level standards. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 40 (2), 87-102.Journal
Reading and Writing QuarterlyRights
© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Educators have, to this point, largely viewed the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and Response to Intervention (RtI) as important but unrelated initiatives. This view is problematic because it fails to acknowledge the potential for RtI to support readers who struggle to meet sophisticated standards and because it fails to attend to ways in which a focus on CCSS enriches RtI programs that are typically characterized by isolated skills instruction. The purpose of this article is to explore opportunities for integrating these initiatives by incorporating the CCSS at each level of RtI. Curriculum based on grade-level CCSS serves as the foundation for Tier 1. Screening to determine which students need additional support also occurs at this level. These students attend targeted Tier 2 classes which focus on off-level CCSS within specific areas of reading such as multi-syllable decoding or retelling, and remain in the regular classroom when a class addresses an area of reading that is a strength for them. Finally, results of Tier 1 unit assessments, the screening measure, and Tier 2 progress monitoring assessments are employed to determine which children need the intense level of support offered by Tier 3 tutoring. I argue here that careful integration of CCSS and RtI levels allows for high levels of achievement for all students.Note
18 month embargo; first published 05 February 2023ISSN
1057-3569Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/10573569.2023.2172496