“This Unfavorable Poll Result for My Candidate Doesn’t Affect Me but Others”: Third-Person Perception in Election Poll Coverage1
Name:
Election_Poll_Coverage.pdf
Size:
412.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Communication, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-11-30Keywords
election pollsindividual desirability
perceived polling effect
question order
South Korea
subjective political knowledge
third-person perception
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Moon, S.-I., Choi, Y., & Chung, S. (2023). “This Unfavorable Poll Result for My Candidate Doesn’t Affect Me but Others”: Third-Person Perception in Election Poll Coverage. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 11(4), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.15206/AJPOR.2023.11.4.274Rights
Copyright © AJPOR. Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The third-person perception phenomenon can consistently be found in opinion poll news, but it remains unknown what determines the degree of the third-person perception (TPP) about specific election poll news. We investigated how respondents’ preferred candidate’s status in the poll affects the perceived impact of polling news on both themselves (PMI1) and on others (PMI3) as well as TPP (PMI3 – PMI1). We also examined the effect of subjective political knowledge and the perceived level of political knowledge of others on TPP. An online experiment was conducted in the context of a gubernatorial election in South Korea, in which the leading candidate in the poll and the question order (self-question first vs. other-question first) were manipulated. The results indicated that PMI1 and PMI3 were greater when the respondent’s preferred candidate was leading in the poll. TPP did not differ depending on subjective knowledge, but it was greater when the others were non-experts (vs. experts). Lastly, question order was found to be a method factor that affected both PMI1 and PMI3. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. © 2023, Center for Asian Public Opinion Research and Collaboration Initiative. All rights reserved.Note
Open access journalISSN
2288-6168Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.15206/ajpor.2023.11.4.274
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © AJPOR. Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).