A Practical Guide to Adopting Bayesian Analyses in Clinical Research
Name:
a-practical-guide-to-adopting- ...
Size:
936.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
University of Arizona, Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsIssue Date
2023-12-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Cambridge University PressCitation
Gunn-Sandell LB, Bedrick EJ, Hutchins JL, Berg AA, Kaizer AM, Carlson NE. A practical guide to adopting Bayesian analyses in clinical research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 2024;8(1):e3. doi:10.1017/cts.2023.689Rights
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Clinical and Translational Science. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Bayesian statistical approaches are extensively used in new statistical methods but have not been adopted at the same rate in clinical and translational (C&T) research. The goal of this paper is to accelerate the transition of new methods into practice by improving the C&T researcher s ability to gain confidence in interpreting and implementing Bayesian analyses. Methods: We developed a Bayesian data analysis plan and implemented that plan for a two-Arm clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a new opioid in reducing time to discharge from the post-operative anesthesia unit and nerve block usage in surgery. Through this application we offer a brief tutorial on Bayesian methods and exhibit how to apply four Bayesian statistical packages from STATA, SAS, and RStan to conduct linear and logistic regression analyses in clinical research. Results: The analysis results in our application were robust to statistical package and consistent across a wide range of prior distributions. STATA was the most approachable package for linear regression but was more limited in the models that could be fitted and easily summarized. SAS and R offered more straightforward documentation and data management for the posteriors. They also offered direct programming of the likelihood making them more easily extendable to complex problems. Conclusion: Bayesian analysis is now accessible to a broad range of data analysts and should be considered in more C&T research analyses. This will allow C&T research teams the ability to adopt and interpret Bayesian methodology in more complex problems where Bayesian approaches are often needed. © 2023 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.Note
Open access journalISSN
2059-8661Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/cts.2023.689
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Clinical and Translational Science. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.