Many hands on this study: Development of a metonymy comprehension task; [Muitas mãos neste trabalho: desenvolvimento de uma tarefa de compreensão de metonímia]
Affiliation
The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-09-15Keywords
cognitive linguisticsfigurative language
metonymy
metonymy comprehension
psycholinguistic task elaboration
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Siqueira, M., Melo, T., Duarte Jr, S., Baiocco, L., Ferrari, C. G., & Lopes, N.. (2023). Many hands on this study: Development of a metonymy comprehension task. DELTA: Documentação De Estudos Em Lingüística Teórica E Aplicada, 39(3), 202339350607. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202339350607Rights
© 2023 The Author(s). This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Metonymy is a pervasive linguistic/cognitive mechanism in everyday language. Still, studies assessing its comprehension are rare in the literature. Our goal is to present the elaboration of a verbal metonymy comprehension task in Brazilian Portuguese as well as test it using pilot studies. The task was based on the cognitive linguistics framework and psychometric guidelines were considered. The construction of the task considered psycholinguistic variables and included a conventionality task and an expert analysis. Three studies (N = 290, ages ranging 2 to 54 years old) were conducted until we reached a final version. The study resulted in a task composed of one practice item and six test items. Each item includes a sentence-stimulus and two questions (one open-ended and one closedended). Together, the items make up a raw score that represents metonymy comprehension. Data obtained from the pilot studies show that metonymy comprehension improves gradually with age and that there is a significant difference between items in both types of questions. This is in consonance with the literature, and thus points towards the instrument’s construct validity. The study results in a task that presents enough sensitivity to gauge comprehension of this phenomenon at different ages. © This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and distribution, provided the original author and source are credited.Note
Open access journalISSN
0102-4450Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1590/1678-460X202339350607
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.