Developing a small participant framework: An investigation of mode choice influential factors
Affiliation
Department of Psychology, The University of ArizonaDepartment of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Mechanics, The University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-11-24Keywords
Dynamic impactMental bias
Mode choice study design
Mode shift
Public transit
Transportation demand management
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier LtdCitation
Pan, M. M., Isham, E., & Ryan, A. (2023). Developing a small participant framework: An investigation of mode choice influential factors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100978.Rights
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
An in-depth comprehension of the changing impact of mode choice influencing factors is essential in planning for behavior-adaptive mode shift policies. This study developed a framework to investigate a method of evaluation of the changes in mode choice using a small participation pool. A field application in Pima County, Arizona was developed to test the developed framework to evaluate the impact of a real transit experience. Twenty-two participants were recruited and repeated measurements were taken before and after their transit trip. The results revealed that people are less susceptible to their mental biases after a transit trip and consider more objective elements such as walking time. The developed framework resulted in successful evaluation methods that are reproducible for other application study designs. Thus, the results further present that low participant recruitment in application-based field studies can be accomplished using this developed methodology, for other regions and studies. © 2023Note
Open access journalISSN
2590-1982Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.trip.2023.100978
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

