Preoperative quality of life at time of gynecologic surgery: considerations for postoperative management
Author
Chase, D.M.McCann, L.D.
Treuth, A.
Cui, H.
Laniewski, P.
Jimenez, N.R.
Mahnert, N.D.
Roe, D.J.
Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M.
Affiliation
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ (Drs McCann, Mahnert, and Herbst-Kralovetz)Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (Ms Treuth and Drs Laniewski, Jimenez, and Herbst-Kralovetz)
University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (Drs Cui and Roe), United States
University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (Drs Cui and Roe)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (Dr Roe)
Issue Date
2023-11-24Keywords
endometrial cancerhysterectomy
National Institutes of Health Toolbox Global Health
Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System survey
Perceived Stress Scale
preoperative
Sexual Function and Satisfaction Brief Profile
uterine fibroids
Vaginal Assessment Scale
Vulvar Assessment Scale
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier Inc.Citation
Chase DM, McCann LD, Treuth A, et al. Preoperative quality of life at time of gynecologic surgery: considerations for postoperative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol Glob Rep 2023;3:100275.Journal
AJOG Global ReportsRights
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients presenting for gynecologic surgery are a heterogeneous group. Preoperative quality of life may be a useful tool to guide postoperative management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the key drivers of preoperative quality of life to improve counseling and postoperative management. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed preoperative survey results from 154 participants using the following surveys: National Institutes of Health Toolbox Global Health v1.2, Gastrointestinal: Gas and Bloating v1.1 13a, Gastrointestinal: Diarrhea v1.0 6a, and Sexual Function and Satisfaction Brief Profile (Female) v2.0, Perceived Stress Scale, the Vaginal Assessment Scale, and the Vulvar Assessment Scale. Survey results in the form of T-scores were compared in patients with endometrial cancer and patients with benign gynecologic conditions using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The multivariate analysis was performed using linear regression to adjust the comparisons for age, body mass index, and comorbidity. RESULTS: Of the 154 patients, preoperative diagnosis was benign in 66% (n=102) and endometrial cancer in 34% (n=52). Patients with endometrial cancer were more likely to be older, non-White, in lower income brackets, have higher body mass index, and be postmenopausal (P<.05). Although preoperative global health scores were similar between benign and malignant cases (P>.05), when adjusted for age, the differences in global health quality of life between patients with benign gynecologic conditions and those with endometrial cancer became significant, because the endometrial cancer group was older than the benign group (P<.05). However, when adjusting for age, body mass index, and comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes), the differences were no longer significant (P>.05). Sexual interest was decreased in the patients with endometrial cancer both in the unadjusted and adjusted model; and vulvar complaints became significantly different between the groups when controlling for body mass index, age, and comorbidities (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Despite substantial differences in preoperative diagnosis, preoperative quality of life is highly influenced by age, body mass index, and comorbidities. Therefore, these factors should be explored in surgical outcomes and postoperative management trials. © 2023 The AuthorsNote
Open access JournalISSN
2666-5778Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100275
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

