Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChase, D.M.
dc.contributor.authorMcCann, L.D.
dc.contributor.authorTreuth, A.
dc.contributor.authorCui, H.
dc.contributor.authorLaniewski, P.
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, N.R.
dc.contributor.authorMahnert, N.D.
dc.contributor.authorRoe, D.J.
dc.contributor.authorHerbst-Kralovetz, M.M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-02T17:55:37Z
dc.date.available2024-04-02T17:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-24
dc.identifier.citationChase DM, McCann LD, Treuth A, et al. Preoperative quality of life at time of gynecologic surgery: considerations for postoperative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol Glob Rep 2023;3:100275.
dc.identifier.issn2666-5778
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100275
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/672183
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Patients presenting for gynecologic surgery are a heterogeneous group. Preoperative quality of life may be a useful tool to guide postoperative management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the key drivers of preoperative quality of life to improve counseling and postoperative management. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed preoperative survey results from 154 participants using the following surveys: National Institutes of Health Toolbox Global Health v1.2, Gastrointestinal: Gas and Bloating v1.1 13a, Gastrointestinal: Diarrhea v1.0 6a, and Sexual Function and Satisfaction Brief Profile (Female) v2.0, Perceived Stress Scale, the Vaginal Assessment Scale, and the Vulvar Assessment Scale. Survey results in the form of T-scores were compared in patients with endometrial cancer and patients with benign gynecologic conditions using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The multivariate analysis was performed using linear regression to adjust the comparisons for age, body mass index, and comorbidity. RESULTS: Of the 154 patients, preoperative diagnosis was benign in 66% (n=102) and endometrial cancer in 34% (n=52). Patients with endometrial cancer were more likely to be older, non-White, in lower income brackets, have higher body mass index, and be postmenopausal (P<.05). Although preoperative global health scores were similar between benign and malignant cases (P>.05), when adjusted for age, the differences in global health quality of life between patients with benign gynecologic conditions and those with endometrial cancer became significant, because the endometrial cancer group was older than the benign group (P<.05). However, when adjusting for age, body mass index, and comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes), the differences were no longer significant (P>.05). Sexual interest was decreased in the patients with endometrial cancer both in the unadjusted and adjusted model; and vulvar complaints became significantly different between the groups when controlling for body mass index, age, and comorbidities (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Despite substantial differences in preoperative diagnosis, preoperative quality of life is highly influenced by age, body mass index, and comorbidities. Therefore, these factors should be explored in surgical outcomes and postoperative management trials. © 2023 The Authors
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectendometrial cancer
dc.subjecthysterectomy
dc.subjectNational Institutes of Health Toolbox Global Health
dc.subjectPatient Reported Outcome Measurement System survey
dc.subjectPerceived Stress Scale
dc.subjectpreoperative
dc.subjectSexual Function and Satisfaction Brief Profile
dc.subjectuterine fibroids
dc.subjectVaginal Assessment Scale
dc.subjectVulvar Assessment Scale
dc.titlePreoperative quality of life at time of gynecologic surgery: considerations for postoperative management
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ (Drs McCann, Mahnert, and Herbst-Kralovetz)
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ (Ms Treuth and Drs Laniewski, Jimenez, and Herbst-Kralovetz)
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (Drs Cui and Roe), United States
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ (Drs Cui and Roe)
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (Dr Roe)
dc.identifier.journalAJOG Global Reports
dc.description.noteOpen access Journal
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleAJOG Global Reports
refterms.dateFOA2024-04-02T17:55:37Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S2666577823001168-main.pdf
Size:
273.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).