Secondary Benefits of Manipulation Checks: Three Illustrations From Behavioral Public Administration
Affiliation
School of Government and Public Policy, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023Keywords
behavioral public administrationexperiments
incentives
internet recruitment of subjects
manipulation checks
public sector bias
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Meier, K., An, S., Davis, J., & Park, J. (2023). Secondary Benefits of Manipulation Checks: Three Illustrations From Behavioral Public Administration. Journal of Policy Studies, 38(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps3840.Journal
Journal of Policy StudiesRights
© The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND-4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Manipulation checks in behavioral public administration are commonly used and reported to determine if the experimental and control group have received different treatments. This paper uses three experiments to argue that manipulation checks for experimental treatments can have secondary benefits that can be used to improve the quality of behavioral work in the field. The three cases address the importance of using more clear terms in experimental manipulations (government v. public), using different on-line platforms to recruit experimental subjects (Mechanical Turk, Prolific, and Data.Spring), and whether larger payments more produce more attentive subjects. © 2023, Seoul National University - Graduate School of Public Administration. All rights reserved.Note
Open access journalISSN
2799-9130Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.52372/jps38401
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND-4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/.