The impact of conservation tillage intensities on mean yields and yield risk
Affiliation
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-07-05
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier LtdCitation
Cooray, A., Rejesus, R. M., Aglasan, S., Li, Z., & Woodley, A. (2024). The Impact of Conservation Tillage Intensities on Mean Yields and Yield Risk. Soil Security, 100126.Journal
Soil SecurityRights
2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Understanding the productivity and production risk effects of conservation tillage practices are important so that growers can make better decisions about tillage systems appropriate for their farm operations. This study investigates the mean yield and yield risk effects of conservation tillage practices with varying levels of tillage intensity and timing. Long-term field trial data for corn (Zea mays, L.) and soybeans (Glycine max, L. Merr.) in the North Carolina Piedmont, together with moment-based regression models, were used to achieve the objective of the study. Our empirical analysis suggests that conservation tillage treatments (with lower tillage intensities and higher residue levels) consistently have higher mean yields than conventional tillage practices in the sandy loam soils of the North Carolina Piedmont. However, we find that conservation tillage practices with lower intensities (and higher residue levels) do not generally have a consistent statistically significant risk reducing effect based on the higher-order moments of the yield distribution (e.g., variance, skewness, and kurtosis). This indicates that conservation tillage does not consistently result in statistically lower production risk relative to conventional tillage methods. © 2023 The Author(s)Note
Open access journalISSN
2667-0062Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100096
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).