Compensation of Academic Research Computing and Data Professionals
Affiliation
The University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-09-10Keywords
CompensationCyberinfrastructure
Population Survey
Professionalization
RCD
Research Computing
Workforce Development
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ACMCitation
Maimone, C., Brown, C., Grash, K., Reidy, C., & Stauffer, A. (2023). Compensation of Academic Research Computing and Data Professionals. In Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing (pp. 145-152).Journal
PEARC 2023 - Computing for the common good: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research ComputingRights
© 2023 Association for Computing Machinery.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Previous work identified low compensation levels as a barrier to recruitment and retention in the Research Computing and Data (RCD) field. In order to better understand the characteristics of RCD compensation, a 2021 survey of RCD professionals in the United States gathered salary information from 480 full-time, currently-employed RCD professionals, including 394 respondents working at non-medical academic institutions. The median salary reported for academic institutions was $90,000 ($80,000 for individual contributor levels), with variation observed across respondents' position levels, gender, ethnicity, education, years of experience, and geography. While RCD roles require a combination of expertise in two fields - research and technology - the median compensation for academic RCD professionals falls below that for either of these fields independently. The variation in compensation within the academic RCD field is also found to be less than the variation in the non-academic technology industry or for academic research faculty positions, with salary ranges limited at the upper end. Smaller differences in compensation between respondents based on years of experience and education were observed compared to the broader labor market. Further research with data from more RCD professionals is needed for a complete analysis of compensation within the RCD field.Note
Immediate accessVersion
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Science Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1145/3569951.3593599
