Allied Attestations: Troubling a Progressive Goodwill and ‘Duty to Speak Out’
Name:
CLEAN_SV_UEEE-2022-0082.R1_Cha ...
Size:
279.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-03-30Keywords
Education
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Informa UK LimitedCitation
Chang, E., Serrano, U., & Kasper, J. (2023). Allied Attestations: Troubling a Progressive Goodwill and ‘Duty to Speak Out.’ Equity & Excellence in Education, 56(1–2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2023.2192982Rights
© 2023 University of Massachusetts Amherst College of Education.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Increasingly fraught disputes over education have elevated local school boards as key sites of inquiry. In this critical ethnography, we examine how ostensibly neutral school board rules, routines, and relations play out in practice. We asked, How do (queer) youth of color proponents, white opponents, and white allies of an anti-oppressive educational program exercise their agency within the organizational contexts of one suburban California school board? Drawing on our field notes and 146 school board testimonies, we argue that white allies leveraged their social positioning (e.g. “As a white male …”) to counteract white opponents’ reactionary grassroots campaign. These allied attestations expressed progressive goodwill and yet reified violent hierarchies of human being that naturalized (queer) youth of color as illegitimate knowers. We discuss how an ethic of co-witnessing might interrupt hierarchies of truth and being encoded in school board organizational settings.Note
18 month embargo; first published 30 March 2023ISSN
1066-5684EISSN
1547-3457Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/10665684.2023.2192982
