Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab-chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer: a United States payer perspective
Name:
Cost-effectiveness_manuscript_ ...
Size:
533.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Marupuru, SrujithaArku, Daniel
Axon, David R
Villa-Zapata, Lorenzo
Yaghoubi, Mohsen
Slack, Marion K
Warholak, Terri
Affiliation
Department of Pharmacy Practice, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-05-31
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.Citation
Marupuru, S., Arku, D., Axon, D. R., Villa-Zapata, L., Yaghoubi, M., Slack, M. K., & Warholak, T. (2023). Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab-chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer: a United States payer perspective. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 23(7), 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2023.2219448Rights
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Objectives: Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug administration as a first-line systemic therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer patients. The current study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab-chemotherapy combination versus chemotherapy alone as a first-line therapy from a US payer perspective. Methods: An economic evaluation was conducted using a partitioned survival model in Microsoft Excel® using data from the CheckMate 649 trial. Three discrete mutually exclusive health states (progression-free, post-progression, and death) were included in the model. The health state occupancy was calculated using the overall survival and progression-free survival curves derived from the CheckMate 649 trial. Cost, resource use, and health utility estimates were estimated from a US payer perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed the uncertainty of the model parameters. Results: Nivolumab-chemotherapy provided additional 0.25 life years compared to chemotherapy alone and the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.701 and 0.561, respectively, producing a gain of 0.140 QALYs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $574,072/QALY. Conclusion: From the US payer perspective, at a willingness to pay threshold of $US150,000/QALY, nivolumab-chemotherapy was not found to be cost-effective as a first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer.Note
12 month embargo; first published 31 May 2023EISSN
1744-8379PubMed ID
37243493Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/14737167.2023.2219448
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
- Authors: Polyzoi M, Sandhu H, Maervoet J, Yuan Y, Chaudhary MA, Varol N, Lee A, Dale P, Jones C, Lubinga SJ, Penrod JR
- Issue date: 2022 Jan-Dec
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
- Authors: Berling M, Chaudhary MA, Yuan Y, Varol N, Dale P, Testa E, Klint J, Lee A, Lubinga SJ, Penrod JR
- Issue date: 2022 Jan-Dec
- Cost-effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
- Authors: Courtney PT, Yip AT, Cherry DR, Salans MA, Kumar A, Murphy JD
- Issue date: 2021 May 3
- Cost-Effectiveness of Ribociclib plus Letrozole Versus Palbociclib plus Letrozole and Letrozole Monotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A U.S. Payer Perspective.
- Authors: Mistry R, May JR, Suri G, Young K, Brixner D, Oderda G, Biskupiak J, Tang D, Bhattacharyya S, Mishra D, Bhattacharyya D, Dalal AA
- Issue date: 2018 Jun