Re-examining Geospatial Online Participatory Tools for Environmental Planning
Name:
Env Mgt Geospatial paper R&R ...
Size:
391.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
School of Geography, Development & Environment, University of ArizonaUdall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2024-04-15Keywords
Environmental planningGeospatial online participatory tool
OPT
Public participation
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLCCitation
Minde, J.M., Gerlak, A.K., Colella, T. et al. Re-examining Geospatial Online Participatory Tools for Environmental Planning. Environmental Management 73, 1276–1292 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-01973-7Journal
Environmental ManagementRights
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Geospatial online participatory tools, or geo-OPTs, are increasingly used worldwide for engaging the public in planning. Yet, despite growth in the adoption and use of geo-OPTs, and the growing scholarship to accompany it, our understanding of their ability to support public participation in environmental planning is still underdeveloped. In this paper, we investigate the application of a geo-OPT by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), a leading water management agency in the United States, in three contextually and geographically diverse cases. Through a combination of document analysis, interviews, and participant observation, we examine the processes and dynamics associated with the development and use of the geo-OPT Crowdsource Reporter. Our findings highlight the importance of managing geo-OPTs not in isolation or as a panacea but rather as part of a broader planning process that recognizes the complexity and significance of communication in geo-OPT processes. Although it may be tempting and seemingly simple to create and launch these online tools, our research reveals how a lack of intention early on may lead to underuse or misapplication of the tool. More significantly, real damage can be done, like increased public frustration and alienation, resulting in breakdown in communications or even worsening public relations for federal agencies.Note
12 month embargo; first published 15 April 2024ISSN
0364-152XEISSN
1432-1009Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy and the Udall Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00267-024-01973-7
