Analysis of backwash settings to maximize net water production in an engineering-scale ultrafiltration system for water reuse
Name:
UF__revised_Clean_MA.pdf
Size:
5.179Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Alhussaini, Mohammed A.Binger, Zachary M.
Souza-Chaves, Bianca M.
Amusat, Oluwamayowa O.
Park, Jangho
Bartholomew, Timothy V.
Gunter, Dan
Achilli, Andrea
Affiliation
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of ArizonaWater and Energy Sustainable Technology (WEST) Center, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-05-24
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier BVCitation
Alhussaini, M. A., Binger, Z. M., Souza-Chaves, B. M., Amusat, O. O., Park, J., Bartholomew, T. V., ... & Achilli, A. (2023). Analysis of backwash settings to maximize net water production in an engineering-scale ultrafiltration system for water reuse. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 53, 103761.Rights
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Ultrafiltration (UF) has been widely utilized as water pretreatment for different applications especially in water reuse. The UF system operation is characterized by a filtration phase, where particles accumulate on the membrane surface resulting in an increase in the transmembrane pressure (TMP) and a cleaning phase, where foulants are removed through cleaning cycles including physical backwash and chemical-enhanced backwash (CEB). In this study, data from an engineering-scale UF system treating reclaimed wastewater were used to assess the impact of backwashing on the filtration process. TMP backwash trigger, backwash duration, and CEB frequency were purposely varied for a cycle-by-cycle investigation on the net water production, water recovery, initial operating TMP, and filtration cycle duration. As the TMP backwash trigger was varied between 62 and 145 kPa, the maximum net water production (63 m3/d) was achieved at 103 kPa and water recovery remained relatively constant at approximately 92 %. Backwash durations of 45, 65, and 85 s were performed where both net water production and water recovery yielded similar results (~63 m3/d and ~ 91 %) compared with 103 kPa TMP backwash trigger. The CEB frequency was also lowered from one every three backwashes (1/3) to 1/6 and 1/12 and resulted in decreased net water production and water recovery while the initial TMP increased. Interestingly, the total number of CEBs remained approximately constant regardless of their frequency. Results suggest that CEB is an important fouling control process to maximize water production.Note
24 month embargo; first published 24 May 2023ISSN
2214-7144Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103761
