The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKlar, Samara
dc.contributor.advisorWeber, Chris
dc.contributor.authorJin, Rongbo
dc.creatorJin, Rongbo
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T23:58:27Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T23:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationJin, Rongbo. (2024). Advances in Affective Polarization: Causes and Constraints (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/672769
dc.description.abstractAffective polarization, the phenomenon that Democrats and Republicans increasingly dislike each other, is the most salient issue in contemporary American politics and poses the toughest challenge for American democracy. Research on affective polarization in the past decade has identified its downstream consequences in both political and nonpolitical settings. More recently, students of polarization started to examine its causes and constraints. However, no consensus has been reached on why it happens and how to mitigate it. Therefore, my dissertation project mainly focuses on the causes and depolarization approaches. This project has three empirical chapters. Chapter 2 addresses the causes of affective polarization by asking a fundamental question—who comes to your mind when thinking about political parties. This chapter has three major findings. First, individuals vary in whom they think of, but most envision partisan prototypes, when asked to think about the parties. Second, when asked to consider less prototypical partisans, partisan animosity decreases. Third, people have the warmest feeling towards the least prototypical out-partisans—nonvoters of the opposing party. Chapter 3 examines the solution to depolarize ordinary Americans by testing the robustness and external validity of an established approach—correcting partisan misperception. I first show that correction works when it is from high-credibility sources but not low-credibility sources. Further, my experiments reveal that correction fails to reduce affective polarization when it is from partisan slant of the sources and political incivility are salient. Chapter 4 investigates the causes of affective polarization by testing the external validity of partisan perceptions and more specifically how inter-party perceptions on racial attitudes shape affective polarization. I first find that partisans have an accurate perception of racial resentment and anti-white bias among the out-partisans. Further, Democrats’ overestimation (and Republicans’ underestimation) of racial resentment and anti-white bias among out-partisans increases animosity towards the out-party.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectaffective polarization
dc.subjectdepolarization
dc.subjectmisperception
dc.titleAdvances in Affective Polarization: Causes and Constraints
dc.typeElectronic Dissertation
dc.typetext
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizona
thesis.degree.leveldoctoral
dc.contributor.committeememberGonzalez, Frank
dc.description.releaseRelease after 05/12/2029
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate College
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Science
thesis.degree.namePh.D.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_21472_sip1_m.pdf
Embargo:
2029-05-12
Size:
5.209Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record