Randomized Phase II Trial of Ficlatuzumab With or Without Cetuximab in Pan-Refractory, Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
Author
Bauman, J.E.Saba, N.F.
Roe, D.
Bauman, J.R.
Kaczmar, J.
Bhatia, A.
Muzaffar, J.
Julian, R.
Wang, S.
Bearelly, S.
Baker, A.
Steuer, C.
Giri, A.
Burtness, B.
Centuori, S.
Caulin, C.
Klein, R.
Saboda, K.
Obara, S.
Chung, C.H.
Affiliation
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of ArizonaUA Comprehensive Cancer Center
UA Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health
Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, UA Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, UA College of Medicine-Tucson, UA Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Pathology, UA College of Medicine-Tucson, UA Comprehensive Cancer Center
Issue Date
2023-03-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Lippincott Williams and WilkinsCitation
Julie E. Bauman et al., Randomized Phase II Trial of Ficlatuzumab With or Without Cetuximab in Pan-Refractory, Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer. JCO 41, 3851-3862(2023). DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.01994Journal
Journal of Clinical OncologyRights
© 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
PURPOSEPrimary or acquired resistance to cetuximab, an antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), minimizes its utility in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Aberrant hepatocyte growth factor/cMet pathway activation is an established resistance mechanism. Dual pathway targeting may overcome resistance.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis multicenter, randomized, noncomparative phase II study evaluated ficlatuzumab, an antihepatocyte growth factor mAb, with or without cetuximab in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. The primary end point was median progression-free survival (PFS); an arm met significance criteria if the lower bound of the 90% CI excluded the historical control of 2 months. Key eligibility criteria were HNSCC with known human papillomavirus (HPV) status, cetuximab resistance (progression within 6 months of exposure in the definitive or recurrent/metastatic setting), and resistance to platinum and anti-PD-1 mAb. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), toxicity, and the association of HPV status and cMet overexpression with efficacy. Continuous Bayesian futility monitoring was used.RESULTSFrom 2018 to 2020, 60 patients were randomly assigned and 58 were treated. Twenty-seven versus 33 patients were allocated to monotherapy versus combination. Arms were balanced for major prognostic factors. The monotherapy arm closed early for futility. The combination arm met prespecified significance criteria with a median PFS of 3.7 months (lower bound 90% CI, 2.3 months; P =.04); the ORR was 6 of 32 (19%), including two complete and four partial responses. Exploratory analyses were limited to the combination arm: the median PFS was 2.3 versus 4.1 months (P =.03) and the ORR was 0 of 16 (0%) versus 6 of 16 (38%; P =.02) in the HPV-positive versus HPV-negative subgroups, respectively. cMet overexpression was associated with reduced hazard of progression in HPV-negative but not HPV-positive disease (P interaction =.02).CONCLUSIONThe ficlatuzumab-cetuximab arm met significance criteria for PFS and warrants phase III development. HPV-negative HNSCC merits consideration as a selection criterion. © American Society of Clinical Oncology.Note
12 month embargo; first published 28 March 2023ISSN
0732-183XPubMed ID
36977289Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1200/JCO.22.01994
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- A randomized phase 2 network trial of tivantinib plus cetuximab versus cetuximab in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
- Authors: Kochanny SE, Worden FP, Adkins DR, Lim DW, Bauman JE, Wagner SA, Brisson RJ, Karrison TG, Stadler WM, Vokes EE, Seiwert TY
- Issue date: 2020 May 15
- A randomized, phase II trial of cetuximab with or without PX-866, an irreversible oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer.
- Authors: Jimeno A, Shirai K, Choi M, Laskin J, Kochenderfer M, Spira A, Cline-Burkhardt V, Winquist E, Hausman D, Walker L, Cohen RB
- Issue date: 2015 Mar
- A randomized phase 2 study of temsirolimus and cetuximab versus temsirolimus alone in recurrent/metastatic, cetuximab-resistant head and neck cancer: The MAESTRO study.
- Authors: Seiwert TY, Kochanny S, Wood K, Worden FP, Adkins D, Wade JL, Sleckman BG, Anderson D, Brisson RJ, Karrison T, Stadler WM, Vokes EE
- Issue date: 2020 Jul 15
- Randomized phase II trial of cixutumumab alone or with cetuximab for refractory recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
- Authors: Ferrarotto R, William WN Jr, Tseng JE, Marur S, Shin DM, Murphy B, Cohen EEW, Thomas CY, Willey R, Cosaert J, Harun N, Jack Lee J, Wistuba IW, Haddad RI, Glisson BS
- Issue date: 2018 Jul
- A phase II trial of paclitaxel plus biweekly cetuximab for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer previously treated with both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibody.
- Authors: Koyama T, Kiyota N, Boku S, Imamura Y, Shibata N, Satake H, Tanaka K, Hayashi H, Onoe T, Asada Y, Yamazaki T, Nose T, Ohata S, Nagatani Y, Kimbara S, Funakoshi Y, Teshima M, Shinomiya H, Minami H
- Issue date: 2024 Jun
