We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.
Characterization of Environmental Seismic Signals in a Post-Wildfire Environment: Examples From the Museum Fire, AZ
Affiliation
Arizona Geological Survey, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-06-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
John Wiley and Sons IncCitation
Porter, R., Joyal, T., Beers, R., Youberg, A., Loverich, J., Schenk, E., & Robichaud, P. R. (2023). Characterization of environmental seismic signals in a post-wildfire environment: Examples from the Museum Fire, AZ. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 128, e2022JF006962. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JF006962Rights
© 2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The 2019 Museum Fire burned in a mountainous region near the city of Flagstaff, AZ, USA. Due to the high risk of post-fire debris flows and flooding entering the city, we deployed a network of seismometers within the burn area and downstream drainages to examine the efficacy of seismic monitoring for post-fire flows. Seismic instruments were deployed during the 2019, 2020, and 2021 monsoon seasons following the fire and recorded several debris flow and flood events, as well as signals associated with rainfall, lightning and wind. Signal power, frequency content, and wave polarization were measured for multiple events and compared to rain gauge records and images recorded by cameras installed in the study area. We use these data to test the efficacy of seismic recordings to (a) detect and differentiate between different energy sources, (b) estimate the timing of lightning strikes, (c) calculate rainfall intensities, and (d) determine debris flow timing, size, velocity, and location. We then calculate forward models of seismic signals associated with debris flows and rainfall to better interpret our results and characterize these events. Our observations and modeling show that we can differentiate between these sources and that seismic data can provide insight into post-fire debris flow characteristics, including relative particle sizes and velocity. © 2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.Note
6 month embargo; first published 28 June 2023ISSN
2169-9003Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1029/2022JF006962