Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCheng, H.
dc.contributor.authorNg'ombe, J.N.
dc.contributor.authorLambert, D.M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-03T03:52:33Z
dc.date.available2024-08-03T03:52:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-05
dc.identifier.citationCheng, H., Ng'ombe, J. N., & Lambert, D. M. (2024). A Bayesian generalized rank ordered logit model. Journal of choice modelling, 50, 100475.
dc.identifier.issn1755-5345
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100475
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/673107
dc.description.abstractUsing rank-ordered logit regression, researchers typically analyze consumer preference data collected with Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) surveys. We propose a generalized rank-ordered logit (GROL) model that allows flexibility in modeling preference heterogeneity. The GROL and mixed rank-ordered logit model (MROL) accommodate preference heterogeneity. However, the GROL also allows one to model heterogeneity as a function of demographic or environmental variables. A Monte Carlo experiment compares the estimates of accuracy and precision of the proposed GROL estimation with the MROL specification. Simulation results suggest that the GROL model performs comparatively well when the GROL or the MROL is the true data-generating process (dgp). Coefficient and willingness-to-pay estimates of the GROL are more precise and accurate compared to the MROL when the MROL is the true dgp. We surmise that the increased precision of the GROL estimator arises from the added flexibility for modeling different sources of heterogeneity. An empirical application analyzes a BWS survey on consumer preferences for single-use eating-ware (SUEW) products made from biobased materials. Findings suggest that consumers value most product degradability and using non-plastic materials to fabricate SUEW. Consumers also valued the rapidity of product degradability and using non-plastic materials to make SUEW plates. Respondent attentiveness also affected willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates across attributes. Results suggest attentive respondents were about $3.00 more WTP for biodegradable SUEW than inattentive respondents. © 2024 The Author(s)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectBayesian analysis
dc.subjectBest-worst survey
dc.subjectGeneralized ranked order logit regression
dc.subjectPreference heterogeneity
dc.titleA Bayesian generalized rank ordered logit model
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Choice Modelling
dc.description.noteOpen access article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Choice Modelling
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-03T03:52:33Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S1755534524000071.pdf
Size:
4.564Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.