Correlational Analysis of the Effective Optical Zone with Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, and Spherical Equivalent in LASIK, PRK, and SMILE
Name:
Correlational_analysis.pdf
Size:
5.042Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
School of Medicine, University of Arizona-PhoenixIssue Date
2024-02-05
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Dove Medical Press LtdCitation
Moshirfar M, Herron MS, Cha DS, Santos JM, Miller LT, Hoopes PC Sr. Correlational Analysis of the Effective Optical Zone with Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, and Spherical Equivalent in LASIK, PRK, and SMILE. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024;18:377-392 https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S440608Journal
Clinical OphthalmologyRights
© 2024 Moshirfar et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Purpose: We assess the relationship between preoperative myopic sphere, astigmatism, and spherical equivalent and effective optical zone (EOZ) size, shape, and decentration within individual populations of post-LASIK, PRK, and SMILE patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted with 118 LASIK, 144 PRK, and 41 SMILE eyes from 179 total patients that underwent compound myopic ablation. One-year postoperative Pentacam tangential difference maps were used for EOZ data measure-ments. Correlational analysis between compound myopic measures [sphere, cylinder, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE)] and EOZ parameters was performed, and differences between groups of myopic sphere and cylinder within each surgery type were assessed. Results: An increase in absolute myopic sphere (and subsequent MRSE) is associated with a smaller EOZ area in SMILE (r=0.454, p=0.003) and a more circular EOZ shape in LASIK (r=0.396, p<0.001) and PRK (r=0.563, p<0.001). An increase in absolute myopic cylinder is associated with an increased EOZ area in all three surgery types [LASIK (r=−0.459, p<0.001), PRK (r=−0.716, p<0.001), SMILE (r=−0.429, p=0.005)] and a more elliptical EOZ in LASIK (r=−0.491, p<0.001) and PRK (r=−0.538, p<0.001). Conclusion: While astigmatism may be correlated to EOZ size within all three refractive surgery types, myopic sphere alone is insufficient to estimate EOZ size differences for procedures with a large blend zone of ablation like LASIK or PRK. Shape is just as important a factor as size to consider when examining corneal EOZ differences; reported correlative findings likely result from inherent differences in surgical technique and abruptness of planned surgical ablation borders. © 2024 Moshirfar et al.Note
Open access journalISSN
1177-5467Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2147/OPTH.S440608
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2024 Moshirfar et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial License.

