PALM: PATIENT-CENTERED TREATMENT RANKING VIA LARGE-SCALE MULTIVARIATE NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
Name:
PALM_Patientcentered.pdf
Size:
5.577Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-03
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of Mathematical StatisticsCitation
Rui Duan. Jiayi Tong. Lifeng Lin. Lisa Levine. Mary Sammel. Joel Stoddard. Tianjing Li. Christopher H Schmid. Haitao Chu. Yong Chen. "PALM: Patient-centered treatment ranking via large-scale multivariate network meta-analysis." Ann. Appl. Stat. 17 (1) 815 - 837, March 2023. https://doi.org/10.1214/22-AOAS1652Journal
Annals of Applied StatisticsRights
© 2023 Institute of Mathematical Statistics.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The growing number of available treatment options has led to urgent needs for reliable answers when choosing the best course of treatment for a patient. As it is often infeasible to compare a large number of treatments in a single randomized controlled trial, multivariate network meta-analyses (NMAs) are used to synthesize evidence from trials of a subset of the treatments, where both efficacy and safety related outcomes are considered simultaneously. However, these large-scale multiple-outcome NMAs have created challenges to existing methods due to the increasing complexity of the unknown correlations between outcomes and treatment comparisons. In this paper, we proposed a new framework for PAtient-centered treatment ranking via Large-scale Multivariate network meta-analysis, termed as PALM, which includes a parsimonious modeling approach, a fast algorithm for parameter estimation and inference, a novel visualization tool for presenting multivariate outcomes, termed as the origami plot, as well as personalized treatment ranking procedures taking into account the individual’s considerations on multiple outcomes. In application to an NMA that compares 14 treatment options for labor induction, we provided a comprehensive illustration of the proposed framework and demonstrated its computational efficiency and practicality, and we obtained new insights and evidence to support patient-centered clinical decision making. © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2023.Note
Immediate accessISSN
1932-6157Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1214/22-AOAS1652
