Affiliation
Repatriation Office, Arizona State Museum, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-04-03Keywords
Archaeological Resources Protection Actcollaboration
cultural resource management
cultural resources damage assessment
curation model for jurisdictional CRM
forensic archaeology
historic property treatment plan
National Historic Preservation Act
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
stewardship
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Cambridge University PressCitation
Welch JR, Cowell S, Ryan SL, Whiting D, Cantley GJ. Cultural Resource Damage Assessment. Advances in Archaeological Practice. 2023;11(2):111-125. doi:10.1017/aap.2022.46Rights
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Unauthorized cultural resource alterations range from looting and grave robbing to contract violations and wildland fires. Such alterations degrade cultural resources' spiritual, communal, ecological, economic, and scientific values. Alterations often violate communal senses of place, security, and belonging. Alterations complicate jurisdiction-specific management, which is premised on up-to-date information on resource sizes, conditions, and significance. Cultural resource damage assessment protocols based on proven forensic practices distil to eight fieldwork steps: verify the alteration, assemble the team, survey the scene, document the evidence, gather the evidence, assess the archaeological value and the cost of repair and restoration, prescribe emergency remediation, and confirm evidence documentation and custody. The eight steps give special consideration to local communities and Indigenous Territories, where unauthorized alterations are as common as they are elsewhere, whereas impacts to spiritual and cultural values are generally greater. Adapted to jurisdiction- and incident-specific circumstances, the steps will guide responses to alterations by community leaders, land managers, regulators, law enforcement agents, and archaeologists, including preparation of excellent damage assessment reports. Damage assessment practitioners and land managers should refine these practices to deter alterations, engage Tribes and other affected communities, halt postalteration degradation, ensure accountability, and enable jurisdiction-scale curation of cultural resources and their unique value constellations. Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology.Note
Open access journalISSN
2326-3768Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/aap.2022.46
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for American Archaeology. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence.

