Performance of Automated Oral Cancer Screening Algorithm in Tobacco Users vs. Non-Tobacco Users
Author
Yang, S.M.Song, B.
Wink, C.
Abouakl, M.
Takesh, T.
Hurlbutt, M.
Dinica, D.
Davis, A.
Liang, R.
Wilder-Smith, P.
Affiliation
College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona-TucsonIssue Date
2023-03-06
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Yang, S.M.; Song, B.; Wink, C.; Abouakl, M.; Takesh, T.; Hurlbutt, M.; Dinica, D.; Davis, A.; Liang, R.; Wilder-Smith, P. Performance of Automated Oral Cancer Screening Algorithm in Tobacco Users vs. Non-Tobacco Users. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3370. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053370Journal
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)Rights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Featured Application: Development of “smart” adjunct oral cancer screening approaches. Oral non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions have similar clinical manifestations, increasing the risk of inaccurate screening decisions that adversely affect oral cancer (OC) outcomes. Tobacco-use-related changes in the oral soft tissues may affect the accuracy of “smart” oral screening modalities. Because smoking is such a strong predictor of OC risk, it may overwhelm the impact of other variables on algorithm performance. The objective was to evaluate the screening accuracy in tobacco users vs. non-users of a previously developed prototype smartphone and machine-learning algorithm-based oral health screening modality. 318 subjects with healthy mucosa or oral lesions were allocated into either a “tobacco smoker” group or a “tobacco non-smoker” group. Next, intraoral autofluorescence (AFI) and polarized white light images (pWLI), risk factors as well as clinical signs and symptoms were recorded using the prototype screening platform. OC risk status as determined by the algorithm was compared with OC risk evaluation by an oral medicine specialist (gold standard). The screening platform achieved 80.0% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 83.67% agreement with specialist screening outcome in tobacco smokers, and 62.1% sensitivity, 82.9% specificity, 73.1% agreement with specialist screening outcome in non-smokers. Tobacco use should be carefully weighted as a variable in the architecture of any imaging-based screening algorithm for OC risk. © 2023 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2076-3417Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/app13053370
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.

