Applying a temporal systematics model to vector Apodizing Phase Plate coronagraphic data: TRAP4vAPP
Author
Liu, P.Bohn, A.J.
Doelman, D.S.
Sutlieff, B.J.
Samland, M.
Kenworthy, M.A.
Snik, F.
Birkby, J.L.
Biller, B.A.
Males, J.R.
Morzinski, K.M.
Close, L.M.
Otten, G.P.P.L.
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-06-12Keywords
Instrumentation: high angular resolutionMethods: data analysis
Planets and satellites: detection
Techniques: high angular resolution
Techniques: image processing
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
EDP SciencesCitation
A&A 674, A115 (2023)Journal
Astronomy and AstrophysicsRights
© The Authors 2023. Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Context. The vector Apodizing Phase Plate (vAPP) is a pupil plane coronagraph that suppresses starlight by forming a dark hole in its point spread function (PSF). The unconventional and non-axisymmetrical PSF arising from the phase modification applied by this coronagraph presents a special challenge to post-processing techniques. Aims. We aim to implement a recently developed post-processing algorithm, temporal reference analysis of planets (TRAP) on vAPP coronagraphic data. The property of TRAP that uses non-local training pixels, combined with the unconventional PSF of vAPP, allows for more flexibility than previous spatial algorithms in selecting reference pixels to model systematic noise. Methods. Datasets from two types of vAPPs are analysed: a double grating-vAPP (dgvAPP360) that produces a single symmetric PSF and a grating-vAPP (gvAPP180) that produces two D-shaped PSFs. We explore how to choose reference pixels to build temporal systematic noise models in TRAP for them. We then compare the performance of TRAP with previously implemented algorithms that produced the best signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) in companion detections in these datasets. Results. We find that the systematic noise between the two D-shaped PSFs is not as temporally associated as expected. Conversely, there is still a significant number of systematic noise sources that are shared by the dark hole and the bright side in the same PSF. We should choose reference pixels from the same PSF when reducing the dgvAPP360 dataset or the gvAPP180 dataset with TRAP. In these datasets, TRAP achieves results consistent with previous best detections, with an improved S/N for the gvAPP180 dataset. © The Authors 2023.Note
Open access journalISSN
0004-6361Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1051/0004-6361/202245333
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Authors 2023. Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.