A JWST/NIRSpec Exploration of the Connection between Ionization Parameter, Electron Density, and Star-formation-rate Surface Density in z = 2.7-6.3 Galaxies
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-07-27
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of PhysicsCitation
Naveen A. Reddy et al 2023 ApJ 952 167Journal
Astrophysical JournalRights
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We examine the factors responsible for the variation in the ionization parameter (U) of high-redshift star-forming galaxies based on medium-resolution JWST/NIRSpec observations obtained by the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science survey. The sample consists of 48 galaxies with redshifts z spec = 2.7−6.3, which are largely representative of typical galaxies at these redshifts. The [S ii] λ λ6718, 6733 doublet is used to estimate electron densities (n e ), and dust-corrected Hα luminosities are used to compute ionizing photon rates (Q). Using composite spectra of galaxies in bins of [O iii] λ λ4960, 5008/[O ii] λ λ3727, 3730 (O32) as a proxy for U, we determine that galaxies with higher O32 have 〈n e〉 ≃ 500 cm−3 that are ≳5 × larger than that of lower-O32 galaxies. We do not find a significant difference in 〈Q〉 between low- and high-O32 galaxies. Photoionization modeling indicates a large spread in log U of ≈1.5 dex at a fixed Z neb. On the other hand, the data indicate a highly significant correlation between U and star-formation-rate surface density (ΣSFR), which appears to be redshift invariant at z ∼ 1.6−6.3, and possibly up to z ∼ 9.5. We consider several avenues through which metallicity and ΣSFR (or gas density) may influence U, including variations in n e and Q, internal dust extinction of ionizing photons, and the effects of gas density on the volume filling fraction. Based on these considerations, we conclude that gas density may play a more central role than metallicity in modulating U at these redshifts. © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
0004-637XVersion
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-4357/acd754
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.